Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 12;140(8):0808011–08080114. doi: 10.1115/1.4039678

Table 1.

Model Generation

Method Strengths Limitations Software
Surface render Lower computational cost Internal features not rendered avizo, geomagic, mimics, parasolid, polydata, scanip
Fast refinement
Volume render Internal features rendered High computational cost amira, avizo, polydata
Intuitive implementation
Meshing element shape
Method Strengths Limitations Software
Hexahedral Easy and intuitive to implement Not useful for complex models ANSYS
Offers higher equation accuracy No near-wall grid refinement
Structured and unstructured methods High computational cost
Fewer equations solved
Tetrahedral Fully resolves complex geometries Difficult to implement ANSYS, gridex, meshsim, tetgen
Allows for easier grid refinement Problem specific
Introduces equation stiffness
Unstructured methods only
More equations solved