Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 Feb;17(2):249–252. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201906-471RL

Table 2.

Associations of geographic dispersion with patient outcomes

Outcomes Unadjusted
Adjusted*
Estimate (95% CI) P Value Estimate (95% CI) P Value %
Primary outcome—subdistribution hazard ratio          
 Rate of discharge 0.6 (0.6–0.7) <0.001 0.8 (0.7–0.9) 0.001
Secondary outcomes—risk ratios          
 In-hospital mortality 3.5 (2.3–5.3) <0.001 1.2 (0.9–1.6) 0.3 Localized: 8
          Dispersed: 10
 Discharge to home 0.9 (0.8–0.9) <0.001 0.95 (0.91–0.99) 0.03 Localized: 77
          Dispersed: 73
 Discharge to skilled nursing facilities 1.7 (1.3–2.2) <0.001 1.5 (1.1–2.0) 0.01 Localized: 11
          Dispersed: 16
 90-d hospital readmissions 1.0 (0.8–1.1) 0.7 1.0 (0.8–1.1) 0.6 Localized: 33
          Dispersed: 31

Definition of abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

*

Models were adjusted for: age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance type, Elixhauser comorbidity scores, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services four-level severity risk adjustment (based on admitting diagnosis, demographics, and comorbidities), admission diagnosis category (from International Classification of Diseases-9 and -10 codes), daily mean number of pulmonary service patients by hospital during the hospitalization, code status (full vs. any limitation on life-sustaining therapies), hospital admission source, intensive care unit as the ward admission source, season, and the patient’s hospital.

Estimated using a Fine and Gray competing risks model to account for the competing risk of death.