Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 6;2011(7):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4

Dick 1986.

Methods Prospective cohort study involving men ˜ 18 years of age. The objective of the study was to determine whether rhinovirus 16 colds could be stopped from spreading with the use of an highly virucidal paper handkerchief (CMF tissues) containing citric acid and other virucidal ingredients. 20 to 25 men ˜ 18 years of age were inoculated intranasally with a safety tested R16. The laboratory‐induced cold was in all aspects comparable to natural colds. 8 of them with the most severe colds (donors) played cards with 12 antibody‐free men (recipients) in a experiment room. Four experiments were conducted, in experiments B and C volunteers used CMF tissues to prevent spreading of R16 colds. In the 2 control experiments (A and D) volunteers were permitted to use cotton handkerchiefs
Participants Males ˜ 18 years of age with a laboratory‐induced R 16 cold (donors) and 12 antibody‐free men (recipients)
Interventions Use of virucidal paper handkerchief (CMF tissues), containing citric acid and other virucidal ingredients to stop the spreading of R16 colds versus normal cotton handkerchiefs
Outcomes Laboratory: serological evidence (serum samples or viral isolation)
 Effectiveness: rhinovirus colds
 Safety: n/a
Notes Risk of bias: low
 Notes: the authors concluded that the use of CMS tissues has been successful, because it determined a complete interruption of transmission of R16 among participants, stopping the spreading in an environment in which possibilities for transfer of virus were constant, and in which the rate of transmission was predictably high under standard conditions (42% of cotton handkerchief users developed colds, but no user of virucidal tissues did so)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk N/A
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk N/A
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk N/A
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk N/A
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk N/A