Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 6;2011(7):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4
Study Reason for exclusion
Abou El Hassan 2004 Topic completely extraneous
Amirav 2005 Randomised controlled trial of aerosol treatment
Anderson 2004 Mathematical model with interesting discussion of interaction between public health measures
Anonymous 2002 News item
Anonymous 2003 No data presented
Anonymous 2004 News item
Anonymous 2005a News item
Anonymous 2005b News item
Anonymous 2005c News item
Apisarnthanarak 2009 Intervention bundle not broken down
Apisarnthanarak 2010 Participants took antivirals
Aragon 2005 Descriptive paper (non‐comparative). Has no viral outcomes
Barros 1999 Correlational study between incidence of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and factors such as overcrowding
Bauer 2009 Historical comparison with RSV gammaglobulin among interventions
Bell 2004 Has unpublished entry exit screening data and extensive references but no comparative data
Bellissimo‐Rodrigues 2009 Intervention is chlorexidine
Ben‐Abraham 2002 Exclude ‐ bacterial illness only
Black 1981 Diarrhoea only outcome
Borkow 2010 No human beings involved
Bouadma 2010 Hospital based ventilator routine
Breugelmans 2004 Description of risk factors in aircraft
Cai 2009 Compliance study
Cantagalli 2010 Outcome outside inclusion criteria
Carbonell‐Estrany 2008 Immunoglobulin intervention and descriptive review       
Carter 2002 News item
Castillo‐Chavez 2003 Editorial
Cava 2005a Survey of quarantinees' views
Cava 2005b Personal experiences of quarantine
CDC 2003 Case reports
Chai 2005 Letter ‐ about MRSA
Chaovavanich 2004 Case report
Chau 2003 No original retrievable data. Mathematical model fitting expected to observed cases with quarantine in the SARS of Hong Kong
Chau 2008 Audit of infection control procedures and compliance with guidelines
Chen 2007 An assessment of the impact of different handwashing teaching methods. No clinical outcomes
Cheng 2010 Confounded by antiviral use for post‐exposure prophylaxis
Chia 2005 Knowledge survey
Clynes 2010 Letters
Cowling 2007 Epidemiology, non‐comparative, non‐interventions study
Daniels 2010 Commentary
Daugherty 2008 No free data presented
Davies 1994 Antibody titres as outcomes with so many biases that interpretation of study is problematic
Day 1993 No acute respiratory infection outcome data
Day 2006 Mathematical model; no new data
Dell'Omodarme 2005 Probabilistic and Bayesian mathematical model of screening at entry
Desenclos 2004 Description of transmission
DiGiovanni 2004 Qualitative study of compliance factors in quarantine
Doebbeling 1992 RCT respiratory data not present. Only 3 viruses isolated in total with no viral typing available
Dwosh 2003 Case series
Edmonds 2010 Lab study
Fendler 2002 Cohort study badly biased with differential health profiles and healthcare workers dependency in intervention and control semi‐cohorts. No attempt at adjusting for confounders was made. No denominators available
Flint 2003 Description of spread in aircraft and non‐comparative data
Fung 2004 Non‐comparative
Garcia 2010 Commentary
Gaydos 2001 Editorial linked to Ryan 2001
Gensini 2004 Interesting historical review
Giroud 2002 Non‐clinical outcomes
Glass 2006 Mathematical model ‐ no original data presented
Goel 2007 Non‐comparative study
Gomersall 2006 Non‐comparative study
Gore 2001 Summary of Dyer 2000 (already included)
Gostin 2003 Not an analytical study
Gralton 2010 Review
Guinan 2002 It would appear that 9 classes took part and "acted as their own controls", but it is not clear if there was cross‐over of classes or not. In addition the outcome is combined gastrointestinal/respiratory. The clue lies in the presence of a nested economic analysis which shows considerable savings in time for staff and pupils if the soap is used: in other words this is a (covert) publicity study
Gupta 2005 Economic model ‐ no new data
Gwaltney 1982 No breakdown of cases by arm given
Han 2003 Non‐comparative
Hayden 1985 This is a RCT with laboratory‐induced colds, small numbers and uncertain numerators but almost certainly because of the unique laboratory conditions (placebo tissues not being a placebo at all) of impossible generalisation. It was a pilot to the far bigger trial by Farr 1988a; Farr 1988b
Hendley 1988 Inappropriate intervention
Hens 2009 Model
Heymann 2009 Already in review as Heymann 2004
Hilburn 2003 No ARI/viral outcomes (e.g. URTIs)
Hilmarsson 2007 Animal study
Hirsch 2006 Study tested pharmacological interventions
Ho 2003 Descriptive review
Hsieh 2007 Mathematical model
Hugonnet 2007 Letter without any data
Jiang 2003 Two papers probably the same paper in different versions: Jiang SP, Huang LW, Wang JF, Wu W, Yin SM, Chen WX, et al. [A study of the architectural factors and the infection rates of healthcare workers in isolation units for severe acute respiratory syndrome]. [Chinese] Chung‐Hua Chieh Ho Ho Hu Hsi Tsa Chih [Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases]. 26(10):594‐7, 2003 Oct
Johnson 2009 Outcomes are non‐clinical
Jones 2005 Historical account
Kaydos‐Daniels 2004 Not an analytical study
Kelso 2009 Model
Khaw 2008 Assessing the efficacy of O2 delivery
Kilabuko 2007 Aetiological study
Kosugi 2004 Non‐comparative study
Lam 2004 Outcomes were generic (infection rates). No laboratory data available for viral diagnosis
Lange 2004 No data presented
Larson 2004 Inappropriate outcomes
Larson 2005 Cluster‐RCT comparing the effects of 2 hand hygiene regimens on infection rates and skin condition and microbial counts of nurses' hands in neonatal intensive care units. Outcomes were generic (for example, pneumonia and microbial counts of participants' skin). No laboratory data available for viral diagnosis
Lau 2004b Attitude survey
Lau 2005 Herbal remedy effectiveness assessment
Lee 2005 Descriptive study of risk and protective factors of transmission in households. No assignment took place
Lee 2010 Cohort study; unclear numbers were vaccinated against influenza
Lipsitch 2003 Mathematical model fit to evidence
Luckingham 1984 Historical report on Tucson experience during Spanish flu pandemic
Ma 2004 Case‐control study of risk factors for SARS
MacIntyre 2010 Commentary on Cowling 2009
Malone 2009 Model
Marin 1991 Viral resistance study
McSweeny 2007 Historical description
Mielke 2009 Review
Mikolajczyk 2008 No intervention
Monsma 1992 Non‐comparative study
Nishiura 2009 Model
O'Callaghan 1993 Letter linked to Isaacs 1991
Olsen 2003 Description of transmission
Ooi 2005 Descriptive study but with interesting organisational chart
Orellano 2010 Confounded by antiviral use
Panchabhai 2009 Pharma intervention
Pang 2004 Descriptive study of Beijing outbreak. Some duplicate data in common with Pang 2003
Pittet 2000 Analysis of relationship between handwashing compliance campaign and nosocomial bacterial infections (e.g. MRSA)
Prasad 2004 Letter about retrospective cohort ‐ behavioural
Rabenau 2005 In vitro test of several disinfectants
Reynolds 2008 Describes the psychological effects of quarantine
Richardson 2010 Non‐clinical study
Riley 2003 Mathematical model fit to evidence
Rodriguez 2009 A “reasonable attempt at minimizing bias” (see inclusion criteria) does not include absenteeism
Rosenthal 2005 Outcomes were generic (for example, pneumonia, URTIs). No laboratory data available for viral diagnosis
Safiulin 1972 Non‐comparative set of studies with no clinical outcomes
Sandrock 2008 Review
Satter 2000 Experiment assessing virucidal activity of finger tip surface ‐ no clinical outcome data
Schull 2007 Describes the impact of SARS in a Toronto study
Seal 2010 Lab study
Seale 2009 Study looking at whether using respirators in A&E department is feasible
Sizun 1996 This is a review, with no original data presented
Stebbins 2009 Attitude survey
Stoner 2007 No study data available
Stukel 2008 Impact of the SARS disruption on care/mortality for other pathologies (for example, acute myocardial infarction). There are no interventions and outcomes are unrelated to acute respiratory infections
Svoboda 2004 Descriptive study with before and after data but shifting denominators
Tracht 2010 Model
Ueno 1990 Experimental study. No clinical intervention
van der Sande 2008 Laboratory study without any clinical outcomes
Viscusi 2009a Lab study
Viscusi 2009b Lab study
Wang 2003 Descriptive study
Wang 2005 Case‐control study of susceptibility factors
Weber 2004 Editorial linked to Larson 2004
Wen 2010 Lab study
White 2005 Redundant publication of White 2003
Wilczynski 1997 Clinical trial of the effects of breast feeding
Wilder‐Smith 2003 Description of risk factors in aircraft
Wilder‐Smith 2005 Descriptive review
Wong 2005 Attitude survey
Yen 2010 Model
Yu 2004 Description of transmission
Zamora 2006 Head‐to‐head comparison of two sets of PPEs with no controls and no clinical outcomes
Zhai 2007 Non‐comparative study
Zhao 2003 CCT of SARS treatment

A&E: accident and emergency
 ARI: acute respiratory infection
 CCT: controlled clinical trial
 MRSA: methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus
 RCT: randomized controlled trial
 RSV: respiratory syncytial virus
 PPE: personal protective equipment
 PEP: post‐exposure prophylaxis
 SARS: severe acute respiratory syndrome
 URTI: upper respiratory tract infection