Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD002795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002795.pub2

Comparison 7. Subgroup analyses ‐ Methodological criteria.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Single versus multi‐centre trials 14 1895 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐5.62 [‐8.95, ‐2.29]
1.1 Single centre trials 6 302 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐2.20 [‐7.95, 3.55]
1.2 Multi‐centre trials 8 1593 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐6.49 [‐10.75, ‐2.22]
2 Single versus multi‐centre trials 13   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Single centre trials 6 188 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.77 [1.20, 2.60]
2.2 Multi‐centre trials 7 1084 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.44 [1.20, 1.72]
3 Industry versus non‐industry funded trials 13 1899 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐6.49 [‐9.64, ‐3.34]
3.1 Industry funded trials 12 1840 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐6.83 [‐10.09, ‐3.57]
3.2 Non‐industry funded trials 1 59 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.90 [‐12.31, 10.51]
4 Industry versus non‐industry funded trials 12   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 Industry funded trials 9 1053 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.61 [1.41, 1.84]
4.2 Non‐industry funded trials 3 105 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.53 [0.81, 2.87]