Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD002795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002795.pub2

Comparison 9. Sensitivity analyses.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Clinical Global Impressions scale improvement item (CGI‐I) : non‐response 13 1272 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.60, 0.74]
1.1 SSRIs 7 999 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.58, 0.74]
1.2 MAOIs 2 178 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.44, 1.44]
1.3 TCAs 1 40 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.6 [0.38, 0.96]
1.4 Other medication 3 55 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.59 [0.35, 0.98]
2 "Worst case" loss to follow up analysis 12 1275 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.37 [1.12, 1.69]
2.1 SSRIs 7 1027 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.52 [1.33, 1.74]
2.2 MAOIs 2 175 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.28 [0.01, 5.42]
2.3 TCAs 1 43 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.64 [0.86, 8.12]
2.4 Other medication 2 30 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.12 [0.51, 2.47]
3 "Best case" loss to follow up analysis 12 1262 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.52 [1.22, 1.90]
3.1 SSRIs 7 1018 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.64 [1.44, 1.87]
3.2 MAOIs 2 172 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.48 [0.06, 3.86]
3.3 TCAs 1 43 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.5 [1.13, 10.81]
3.4 Other medication 2 29 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.14 [0.52, 2.51]