Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD002795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002795.pub2

Davidson 1990.

Methods DESIGN
 Description: balanced randomization, placebo‐controlled, parallel arms, flexible dose, double‐blind, single centre
BLINDING
 Participants: Unclear
 Assessors: Unclear
 Administrators: Unclear
ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT
 Method: Unclear
RANDOMISATION
 Method: Unclear
Participants SAMPLE 
 Description: 46 DSM‐III PTSD, chronic, combat veterans, presumably all males, inpatients included, 20% (9/46) MDD, most common comorbid diagnosis: GAD (16), baseline severity on IES: amitriptyline (33.1) placebo (36.8)
SCREENING
 Primary diagnosis: SI‐PTSD
 Comorbidity: None
Interventions Description: amitriptyline (50‐300 mg/d) vs placebo x 8 weeks, ongoing supportive psychotherapy
Outcomes Primary outcomes: CGI‐I , SI‐PTSD, CGI‐S
 Secondary outcomes: HAM‐D, HAM‐A, IES, NI, EPI
Data estimation: completer values
Notes INDUSTRY SUPPORT
 Industry funded: No
 Medication provided by industry: No 
 Any of the authors work for industry: No
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 Drop‐out rates: 8/25 (32%) on amitriptyline, 5/21 (24%) on placebo.
 Quality rating score: 24
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear