Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD002795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002795.pub2

Davidson 2001a.

Methods DESIGN
 Description: random‐assignment, placebo‐controlled, parallel arm, flexible dose, double‐blind, multicentre, 1 week single‐blind placebo run‐in
BLINDING
 Participants: Unclear
 Assessors: Unclear
 Administrators: Unclear
ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT
 Method: Unclear
RANDOMISATION
 Method: computer generated
Participants SAMPLE 
 Description: 208 DSM‐III‐R PTSD, 5% war trauma, mean age: 37.1 (18‐69), 78% male, duration of diagnosis: 12.3 years, 40% (83/208) MDD, baseline severity on CAPS‐2: sertraline (73.9) placebo (73.5)
SCREENING
 Primary diagnosis: CAPS‐1, CAPS‐2 >= 50, minimum 6 months duration
 Comorbidity: None
Interventions Description: sertraline 25 mg/d to between 50‐200 mg/d (avg: 146.3 mg/d) vs. placebo x 12 weeks
Outcomes Primary outcomes: CAPS‐2, IES, CGI‐S, CGI‐I
 Secondary outcomes: DTS, HAM‐D, HAM‐A, PSQI
Data estimation: LOCF (1 post‐baseline assessment)
Notes INDUSTRY SUPPORT
 Industry funded: Yes
 Medication provided by industry: No 
 Any of the authors work for industry: Yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 Drop‐out rates: 30% on sertraline and 27% on placebo (not clear which sample was used as denominator)
 Quality rating score: 33
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear