Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD002795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002795.pub2

Kaplan 1996.

Methods Description: random‐assignment, placebo‐controlled, crossover, fixed dose, double‐blind, 2 week washout period
BLINDING
 Participants: Yes
 Assessors: Unclear
 Administrators: Yes (self administered)
ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT
 Method: Identical capsules used for medication and placebo
RANDOMISATION
 Method: pre‐arranged random code
Participants SAMPLE 
 Description: 17 DSM‐III‐R PTSD, 23% (3/13) combat‐related, mean age for OC: 39.7 year (25‐56), 62% male, duration of diagnosis for OC: 0.5‐28 years, no comorbid major depression, baseline severity on IES for OC: inositol (35.8) and placebo (34.9)
SCREENING
 Primary diagnosis: No information
 Comorbidity: No information
Interventions Description: inositol 12 g/d versus placebo x 4 weeks
Outcomes IES , SCL‐90 (1 centre), HAM‐A, HAM‐D (other centre)
 (no distinction between primary and secondary outcomes)
Data estimation: Completer values
Notes INDUSTRY SUPPORT
 Industry funded: No information
 Medication provided by industry: No 
 Any of the authors work for industry: No information
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 Drop‐out rates: 4/17 (24%)
 Quality rating score: 13
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear