Kaplan 1996.
Methods | Description: random‐assignment, placebo‐controlled, crossover, fixed dose, double‐blind, 2 week washout period BLINDING Participants: Yes Assessors: Unclear Administrators: Yes (self administered) ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT Method: Identical capsules used for medication and placebo RANDOMISATION Method: pre‐arranged random code |
|
Participants | SAMPLE
Description: 17 DSM‐III‐R PTSD, 23% (3/13) combat‐related, mean age for OC: 39.7 year (25‐56), 62% male, duration of diagnosis for OC: 0.5‐28 years, no comorbid major depression, baseline severity on IES for OC: inositol (35.8) and placebo (34.9) SCREENING Primary diagnosis: No information Comorbidity: No information |
|
Interventions | Description: inositol 12 g/d versus placebo x 4 weeks | |
Outcomes | IES , SCL‐90 (1 centre), HAM‐A, HAM‐D (other centre)
(no distinction between primary and secondary outcomes) Data estimation: Completer values |
|
Notes | INDUSTRY SUPPORT
Industry funded: No information
Medication provided by industry: No
Any of the authors work for industry: No information ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Drop‐out rates: 4/17 (24%) Quality rating score: 13 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | B ‐ Unclear |