Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD002795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002795.pub2

Marshall 2001.

Methods DESIGN
 Description: random‐assignment, comparator and placebo‐controlled, parallel arm, fixed dose, double‐blind, 1 week placebo run‐in
BLINDING
 Participants: Unclear
 Assessors: Unclear
 Administrators: Unclear
ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT
 Method: Unclear
RANDOMISATION
 Method: Unclear
Participants SAMPLE 
 Description: 563 DSM‐IV PTSD, mean age: 41.8 years, 57% (315 /551) female, average duration of diagnosis: 15.7 years, approximately 45% (248/551) comorbid MDD, baseline severity on CAPS‐2:: paroxetine 20mg/d (75.3), paroxetine 40mg/d (74.3), and placebo ( 74.4)
SCREENING
 Primary diagnosis: MINI, CAPS‐1, CAPS‐2 >= 50
 Comorbidity: No information
Interventions Description: paroxetine (25 mg/d) or paroxetine (50 mg/d) versus placebo x 12 weeks
Outcomes Primary outcomes: CAPS‐2, CGI‐I
 Secondary outcomes: DTS, TOP‐8, SDS, MADRS
Data estimation: LOCF (1 post‐baseline assessment)
Notes INDUSTRY SUPPORT
 Industry funded: Yes
 Medication provided by industry: No information
 Any of the authors work for industry: Yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 Drop‐out rates: 35% (66/188) on 20mg/d paroxetine, 40% (74/187) on 40mg/d paroxetine, and 36% (68/188) placebo
 Quality rating score: 26
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear