Table 2.

Resources used, Mean (SD)

	CHOICE+GTO Group (n=14 sites)		CHOICE Group (n=15 sites)
Year 1 Resource use - hours	GTO Staff Costs	BGC Costs	BGC Costs
CHOICE training - BGC staff		14.3 (6.2)	10.9 (4.5)
CHOICE training - trainer		2.6 (1.0)	2.4 (0.7)
CHOICE implementation*		15.7 (14.6)	12.9 (8.6)
GTO training and TA at the site	11.2 (3.4)	17.5 (8.4)
Travel time to sites for TA	10.1 (4.2)
GTO training non-site, non-travel preparation†	10.2 (--)
TA supervision - supervisor time†	5.3 (--)
TA supervision - TA time†	7.0 (--)
Year 1 Resource use – miles and number of trips for TA
CHOICE implementation		2.6 (5.4)	23.2 (31.4)
Mileage to sites for TA	220.7 (92.3)
Number of round trips for TA	4.9 (1.6)
Year 2 Resource use - hours
CHOICE training - BGC staff		6.0 (6.2)
CHOICE training - trainer		2.6 (3.5)
CHOICE implementation‡		12.2 (4.7)	7.7 (4.2)
GTO training and TA at the site	14.7 (3.9)	19.2 (8.6)
Travel time to sites for TA	10.4 (4.6)
GTO training non-site, non-travel preparation†	15.4 (--)
TA supervision - supervisor time†	5.7 (--)
TA supervision - TA time†	7.0 (--)
Year 2 Resource use – miles and number of trips for TA
CHOICE implementation		4.0 (8.6)	1.4 (3.5)
Mileage to sites for TA	229.0 (112.2)
Number of round trips for TA	5.2 (2.4)

BGC = Boys and Girls Club; CHOICE = an evidence-based program to prevent substance misuse in youth; GTO = Getting to Outcomes implementation support system; TA = GTO technical assistance

^*The differences between groups in CHOICE training and implementation hours by site in year 1 were not statistically significant: p = .584 and p = .538, respectively.

^†The use of these resources was not tracked by site; thus, only site averages are available.

^‡In year 2 BGC staff in the CHOICE+GTO group sites spent significantly more hours on CHOICE implementation than those in the CHOICE only group: p = .011.