Table 2.
Odds ratioa | 99% CI | P-valueb | |
---|---|---|---|
Computer control | 3.6 | [2.6–5.2] | <0.001 |
Health literacy | 12 | [6.9–23] | <0.001 |
Usagec | |||
Messaging function | 1.02 | [0.91–1.1] | 0.69 |
Lab result function | 1.05 | [0.92–1.2] | 0.35 |
Appointment function | 1.06 | [0.92–1.2] | 0.29 |
Medication function | 0.92 | [0.78–1.1] | 0.19 |
Immunization function | 0.84 | [0.73–0.96] | <0.001 |
Demographics | |||
Age | 1.0 | [0.99–1.01] | 0.33 |
Non-Hispanic White | 1.2 | [0.70–2.0] | 0.43 |
Non-Hispanic Black | 1.3 | [0.73–2.3] | 0.24 |
Other Non-Hispanic | 0.74 | [0.41–1.3] | 0.18 |
Other Hispanicd | 1 | – | – |
Sex | |||
Female | 1.03 | [0.91–1.2] | 0.52 |
Maled | 1 | – | – |
OR [99% CI] denotes the odds of scoring satisfaction one level higher per one unit increase in the covariate, with all other factors held equal.
Overall model was significant (P < 0.001) with a pseudo-R2 of 0.01.
Usage counts are scaled and transformed by a normalizing factor.
Collinear factors omitted from the model.