Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 3;2(4):416–422. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz013

Table 3.

First line treatment proportions and associated confidence intervals

Line 1 treatment Flatiron drug proportion ± confidence interval McKesson drug proportion ± confidence interval MarketScan drug proportion ± confidence interval PharMetrics+ drug proportion ± confidence interval Social media drug proportion ± confidence interval
Ipilimumab 24.8% ± 1.6% 45.2% ± 4.1% 16.7% ± 1.3% 34.9% ± 3.4% 42.2% ± 3.4%
Pembrolizumab 13.6% ± 1.3% 18.8% ± 3.2% 5.8% ± 0.8% 12.5% ± 2.4% 11.3% ± 2.2%
Vemurafenib 10.2% ± 1.2% 1.3% ± 0.9% 5.4% ± 0.8% 5.1% ± 1.6% 13.3% ± 2.3%
Dabrafenib and Trametinib 9.7% ± 1.1% 2.1% ± 1.2% 4.3% ± 0.7% 6.2% ± 1.7% 5.5% ± 1.6%
Ipilimumab and Nivolumab 9.4% ± 1.1% 13.8% ± 2.9% 3.5% ± 0.6% 9.7% ± 2.1% 6% ± 1.6%
Nivolumab 8.7% ± 1.1% 13.6% ± 2.8% 3.1% ± 0.6% 11.5% ± 2.3% 4.4% ± 1.4%

Note: Bold values indicate where social media estimates overlap with a database.