Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 3;2(4):416–422. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz013

Table 5.

Third line treatment proportions and associated confidence intervals

Line 3 treatment Flatiron drug proportion ± confidence interval McKesson drug proportion ± confidence interval MarketScan drug proportion ± confidence interval PharMetrics+ drug proportion ± confidence interval Social media drug proportion ± confidence interval
Pembrolizumab 15.3% ± 3.9% 22.7% ± 10.1% 4.1% ± 1.7% 18.2% ± 6.1% 4.1% ± 4.6%
Dabrafenib and Trametinib 12.9% ± 3.6% 0% ± 0% 7.0% ± 2.2% 13.0% ± 5.3% 9.6% ± 6.8%
Nivolumab 12.0% ± 3.5% 22.7% ± 10.1% 5.3% ± 1.9% 16.9% ± 5.9% 19.2% ± 9.0%
Ipilimumab 9.2% ± 3.1% 9.1% ± 6.9% 7.0% ± 2.2% 10.4% ± 4.8% 16.4% ± 8.5%
Ipilimumab and Nivolumab 8.9% ± 3.1% 18.2% ± 9.3% 2.5% ± 1.4% 2.6% ± 2.5% 12.3% ± 7.5%
Temozolomide 4.9% ± 2.3% 0% ± 0% 3.3% ± 1.5% 5.2% ± 3.5% 1.4% ± 2.7%

Note: Bold values indicate where social media estimates overlap with a database.