Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 4;4(1):102–117. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz157

Table 5.

Effects of feeding ractopamine hydrochloride on temperament and mobility of Holstein steers

Dose P-value Duration P-value
Item 0 300 400 SEM Linear Quadratic 28 35 42 SEM Linear Quadratic
Pens 13 13 13 13 13 13
Steers 237 239 241 238 239 240
 Chute temperament1
  Day 02 1.68  1.61 1.51 0.09 0.11 0.52 1.60 1.61 1.51 0.09 0.35 0.09
  Final3 1.65 1.57 1.62 0.25 0.55 0.45 1.64 1.54 1.66 0.25 0.88 0.10
 Chute exit4
  Day 0 1.79 1.58 1.50 0.12 <0.001 0.95 1.67 1.47 1.74 0.12 0.51 <0.001
  Final5 1.39 1.26 1.21 0.20 0.02 0.55 1.25 1.25 1.35 0.20 0.14 0.45
Pens 8 8 8 8 8 8
Steers 137 135 138 137 136 136
 Stride length6, cm
  Day 0 40.8 41.4 41.7 0.03 0.37 0.76 43.3 40.4 40.6 0.30 0.02 0.31
  Final 43.1 44.9 47.4 0.02 <0.001 0.96 43.2 47.9 44.9 0.20 0.37 0.02
 Mobility7
  Day 0 1.17 1.13 1.14 0.06 0.45 0.67 1.16 1.13 1.15 0.06 0.79 0.66
  Final 1.18 1.17 1.16 0.04 0.67 0.93 1.14 1.24 1.13 0.04 0.88 0.04
 Harvest mobility8 1.32 1.39 1.37 0.06 0.19 0.45 1.32 1.41 1.35 0.06 0.53 0.11

1Steers were observed in a squeeze chute for 15 s after their head was caught, by one blinded, trained observer. The 1 to 4 point scoring system was adapted from Grandin (1995): 1 = calm, no movement; 2 = restless shifting; 3 = head throwing, squirming and occasionally shaking the squeeze chute; 4 = violently and continually shaking the squeeze chute.

2Respective duration ractopamine hydrochloride feeding day 0.

3Last day of ractopamine hydrochloride feeding.

4Steers were observed as steers left the squeeze chute by one trained individual. The 1 to 4 point scoring system was adapted from Grandin (1995): 1 = normal walk; 2 = trot or fast walk; 3 = run or sprint; 4 = leap or jump.

5Last day of ractopamine hydrochloride feeding. d 0 chute exit score was used as a covariate in the model (P = 0.01).

6Steers were observed for individual stride length while moving approximately 4 m from the squeeze chute by measuring the distance between the furthest back rear foot to the back of the forward rear foot when both hooves were in contact with the dirt surface.

7Steers were evaluated for individual mobility while moving approximately 30 ft from exiting the squeeze chute. The 1 to 4 point scoring system was adapted from Lily Edwards-Callaway, JBS: 1 = normal, fluid, even rhythm, and weight bearing on all 4 feet; 2 = slightly hesitant and stiff, shuffles feet, but still moves with the herd; 3 = obviously still and sore footed, reluctant to move, cannot keep up with the herd; 4 = extremely reluctant to move, animal refused to move when encouraged by a handler; any steps are short and very unsteady.

8Harvest mobility scores were observed at packing plant as steers were moved into harvest facility.