Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 31;15(1):e0228379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228379

Table 3. “Communication and trust”, “collaboration in care” and subtests item-level Rasch locations and fit statistics.

Location Standard error Fit residual Chi-square Probability
Communication and trust, items (i)
i22. Staff are accommodating −2.202 0.135 −1.240 7.269 0.0638
i5. I can consult with the staff if I have questions or concerns −0.637 0.119 −0.645 2.668 0.4456
i30. Trust that he/she gets necessary care −0.373 0.120 −0.742 3.068 0.3813
i27. Pleased with the contact −0.247 0.113 −2.787 11.381 0.0098*
i8. I am notified when there is a change 0.388 0.106 0.482 1.777 0.6199
i4. Staff take time to talk with me 0.532 0.110 −0.508 3.419 0.3315
i1. I feel well-informed 0.807 0.110 −0.470 2.855 0.4145
i28. Can maintain her/his identity 0.818 0.101 1.336 7.893 0.0483*
i25. Criticism can be given 0.916 0.106 2.736 8.537 0.0361*
Collaboration in care, items (i)
i13. Opportunity to participate −1.001 0.097 1.133 6.484 0.0903
i16. I feel that I am respected −0.629 0.091 −1.541 1.528 0.6758
i21. Happy with the influence I have −0.558 0.091 −1.372 2.610 0.4557
i18. Involved in decisions −0.350 0.092 −0.644 2.915 0.4049
i17. Being asked about my opinion −0.067 0.089 −2.186 9.139 0.0275*
i3. Information about how I can best help 0.409 0.089 2.373 2.911 0.4055
i14. Ask me about my knowledge 0.492 0.085 1.581 0.158 0.9841
i11. Discuss with the staff what tasks in the care I can be responsible for 0.788 0.083 1.041 1.082 0.7814
i9. Asked to participate in the care 0.916 0.089 0.804 3.058 0.3828
Subtests
Communication and trust −0.163 0.028 0.670 0.707 0.8715
Collaboration in care 0.163 0.025 −0.313 1.065 0.7856

*Not significant after Bonferroni adjustment