Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 13;20(1):8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.002

Table 3.

Lead and procedure characteristics.

Total leads removed (n = 138) Explantation (n = 58) Extraction (n = 80) p- valuea
Lead type
 Atrial pacing leads 50 (36.2) 23 (39.7) 27 (33.7)
 Ventricular pacing leads 75 (54.3) 32 (55.2) 43 (53.7)
 VDD pacing leads 1 (0.7) 0 (0) 1 (1.2)
 Coronary sinus leads 6 (4.3) 2 (3.4) 4 (5.0)
 Single coil ICD leads 2 (1.4) 0 (0) 2 (2.5)
 Dual coil ICD leads 4 (2.9) 1 (1.7) 3 (3.8)
Lead fixation
 Active 70 (50.7) 37 (63.8) 33 (41.2) 0.009
 Passive 68 (49.3) 21 (36.2) 47 (58.8)
Unipolar leads 3 (2.2) 1 (1.7) 2 (2.5) 0.758
Vascular access for the leads
 Subclavian/axillary 125 (90.6) 52 (89.7) 73 (91.2) 0.752
 Cephalic 13 (9.4) 6 (10.3) 7 (8.8)
Cut leads 7 (5.1) 0 (0) 7 (8.8) 0.021
Side of the implant
 Left side 79 (57.2) 37 (63.8) 42 (52.5) 0.186
 Right side 59 (42.8) 21 (36.2) 38 (47.5)
Dwell time, months 22.1 (4.5–61.3) 3.9 (2.9–8.6) 52.1 (28.2–117.2)
Place of explantation
 Electrophysiology lab 128 (92.8) 55 (94.8) 73 (91.2) 0.424
 Operating room 10 (7.2) 3 (5.2) 7 (8.8)
Technique of explantation
 Manual traction only 115 (83.3) 58 (100.0) 57 (71.2)
 Traction tools (Lead locking device and/or snare) 9 (6.5) 9 (11.2)
 Cutting sheaths 14 (10.1) 14 (17.5)
Successful removal
 Success 123 (89.1) 58 (100.0) 65 (81.2) <0.001
 Total removal 121 (87.7) 58 (100.0) 63 (78.8)
 Partial removal (<4 cm remnant left) 2 (1.4) 0 (0) 2 (2.5)

Note: Values are frequency (%) or median (25th percentile - 75th percentile).

– Not applicable or not analyzed.

a

Comparison between explantation and extraction groups.