Table 2.
Incubation-driven vs. enactment-driven expected performance rise at Time 2
| Initial interactivity level | Final interactivity level | |
|---|---|---|
| Low | High | |
| Incubation-driven performance improvement at Time 2 | ||
| Low | +a | +b1 |
| High | ++b1 | ++a |
| Enactment-driven performance improvement at Time 2 | ||
| Low | +a | ++b2 |
| High | +b2 | ++a |
Time 1 = initial interactivity level, Time 2 = final interactivity level
aDenotes small (+) or large (++) increase in performance observed in Experiment 1
bDenotes small (+) or large (++) increase in performance expected in Experiment 2, under the (1) incubation-driven or the (2) enactment-driven hypothesis, respectively