Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 31;11:638. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14494-8

Table 1.

Reaction optimizationa,b.

graphic file with name 41467_2020_14494_Figa_HTML.gif
Entry Photocatalysts Solvent Time (h) Yieldb/%
1 Eosin Y DMSO 15 64
2 Rose bengal DMSO 12 72
3 Acridinium salt DMSO 36 64
4 DCA DMSO 15 NR
5 MB DMSO 15 Trace
6 Ensin B DMSO 24 61
7 Ru(bpy)3Cl2·6H2O DMSO 36 62
8 fac-Ir(ppy)3 DMSO 36 56
9 Rose bengal DMF 12 10
10 Rose bengal MeCN 12 20
11 Rose bengal MeOH 12 51
12 Rose bengal CHCl3 12 Trace
13 Rose bengal Acetone 12 55
14 Rose bengal Toluene 12 NR
15 Rose bengal EtOAc 12 15
16 Rose bengal 1,4-dioxane 12 22
17c Rose bengal DMSO 12 51
18 DMSO 12 NR
19d Rose bengal DMSO 12 NR
graphic file with name 41467_2020_14494_Figb_HTML.gif

NR no reaction.

aThe reactions were carried out with 1a (0.2 mmol), CF2HSO2Na 2 (0.4 mmol), photocatalyst (2 mol%) in 1 mL solvent under two 3 W green LEDs irradiation at room temperature.

bIsolated yield.

cThe photocatalyst loading was decreased to 1 mol%.

dIn the dark.