Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;117(4):2187–2193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918819117

Table 2.

Comparison of maximum post-BD-FEV1% between patients treated with and without daily oral GCs among the HSD3B1(1245) AA, AC, and CC genotypes*

SARP III SARP I & II
HSD3B1(1245) Genotype Not on GC On GC P value Not on GC On GC P value
AA
  n 123 23 45 35
  Pre-FEV1, % of predicted value 75.1 ± 18.3 54.3 ± 15.3 <0.001 63.4 ± 18.8 49.8 ± 17.1 0.001
  Post-FEV1, % of predicted value 83.9 ± 18.8 64.2 ± 19.6 < 0.001 73.5 ± 15.9 63.7 ± 18.4 0.024
AC
  n 107 24 49 30
  Pre-FEV1, % of predicted value 75.6 ± 21.2 59.4 ± 19.8 0.001 66.9 ± 22.3 54.3 ± 18.3 0.008
  Post-FEV1, % of predicted value 83.2 ± 20.5 67.7 ± 17.9 <0.001 77.2 ± 20.8 67.8 ± 20.3 0.07
CC
  n 33 8 15 10
  Pre-FEV1, % of predicted value 78.9 ± 16.3 73.4 ± 16.6 0.41 67.7 ± 22.5 66.7 ± 26.6 0.92
  Post-FEV1, % of predicted value 89.2 ± 17.0 83.1 ± 14.4 0.32 78.2 ± 22.3 80.7 ± 16.2 0.76
*

Data are presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables and proportions or percentages for categorical variables.

P value comparing daily oral GC vs. no GC in each genotype group AA, AC, and CC.