Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 1;8:4. doi: 10.1186/s40337-020-0277-8

Table 12.

Family therapy (dynamic) for children and adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa

Certainty assessment Impact Certainty Importance
№ of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations
RCT - Good Outcome (assessed with: Morgan Russell)
 1 randomised trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none one RCT involving 60 adolescents randomized to TAU or TAU plus Family Therapy looking at family dynamics. 12/30 had a good outcome in the FT group compared to 5/30 in the TAU group (p < 0.05).

⨁⨁⨁⨁

HIGH

CRITICAL
Weight (assessed with: kg)
 3 Case Reports very serious a,b not serious not serious not serious none three case reports looking at 4 female patients (one set of twins) treated with family therapy (one solution focused). Weight improved in all cases.

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Explanations

ano randomization

bno control group

Bibliography:

RCT - Godart 2012 [90]

Case Reports - Debow 1975 [91], Lane 1987 [92], O’Halloran 1999 [93]