Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 1;8:4. doi: 10.1186/s40337-020-0277-8

Table 19.

Adolescent focused psychotherapy/psychodynamic for Anorexia Nervosa

Certainty assessment Impact Certainty Importance
№ of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations
Remission (assessed with: normal weight and EDE score)
 2 randomised trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none RCT of Adolescent Focused Psychotherapy versus FBT (n = 121, 11male, 110 female, age 12–18). 12/60 (20%) remitted at end of treatment in AFT group versus 21/61 (34.4%) in FBT group. No significant differences in terms of remission. No differences in remission in another RCT (n = 37). 52.6% in FBT reached 50th percentile weight vs. 41.2 in individual (p < 0.05).

⨁⨁⨁⨁

HIGH

CRITICAL
not serious not serious not serious not serious none Those in FBT had greater change on EDE scores at end of treatment.

⨁⨁⨁⨁

HIGH

CRITICAL
Weight
 2 Case Reports very serious a,b not serious not serious not serious none Two case reports describing three cases total (age 12–16 years, all female) in which psychodynamic therapy over 1–2 years of therapy resulted in weight restoration.

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Explanations

ano control condition

bno randomization

Bibliography:

RCT - Lock 2010 [23], Robin 1999 [22]

Case Reports - Fitzpatrick 2010 [128], Pharis 1984 [129]