Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 31;21:38. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3334-z

Table 1.

The performance comparison of BCREval and Bismark

ENCODE ID File Size Reads Number Processing Time Memory Usage CHH methylation ratio %
Bismark BCREval Bismark BCREval Bismark BCREval
ENCFF055UXZ 1.1G 12 M 4 h 49 m 10 m 10G 44 M 0.7 0.56
ENCFF336KJH 687 M 12 M 4 h 8 m 9 m 10G 44 M 0.5 0.54
ENCFF677BSB 926 M 12 M 5 h 28 m 9 m 10G 44 M 1.1 0.42
ENCFF781BRM 833 M 12 M 5 h 5 m 9 m 10G 44 M 0.5 0.26
ENCFF710XQC 1011 M 12 M 5 h 5 m 10 m 10G 44 M 0.8 0.45
ENCFF211RZY 1.1G 12 M 4 h 39 m 10 m 10G 44 M 0.5 0.17
ENCFF563QAT 821 M 12 M 4 h 31 m 8 m 10G 44 M 0.5 0.18
ENCFF311PSV 686 M 12 M 4 h 36 m 10 m 10G 44 M 1.1 0.3