Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 1;20:99. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4793-6

Table 4.

Diagnostic performance of conventional methods and the multiplex PCR-based assay and using conventional methods, final clinical diagnosis of empyema, empyema and pleura fluid ≤7.2 as reference-standard

1. All cases – Conventional methods as reference-standard Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Positive predictive value (%)
Multiplex PCR-based assay vs. all pathogens 12 93.5 20
Multiplex PCR-based assay vs. only panel pathogens 67 93.7 13
2. Using cases with final clinical diagnosis of empyema - conventional methods as reference-standard Sensitivity Specificity
Multiplex PCR-based assay vs. all pathogens 15.8 80 27
Multiplex PCR-based assay vs. only panel pathogens 100 84.2 18
3. Using cases with or without empyema diagnosis as reference-standard Sensitivity Specificity
Conventional methods (all pathogens) 32.8 96.1 77
Conventional methods only panel pathogens 3.3 99.3 67
Multiplex PCR-based assay 18.6 97.3 73
4. Using cases with or without pleural fluid pH ≤ 7.2 as reference standard Sensitivity Specificity
Conventional methods (all pathogens) 37.8 95.8 70
Conventional methods only panel pathogens 2.7 99.3 100
Multiplex PCR-based assay 13.5 97.1 56