Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 24;2014(11):CD008721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008721.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Arimura 2009 Retrospective, comparative study
Fulda 2010 Not a randomised clinical trial. Each participant received the 2 evaluated interventions. The right eye received intravitreal bevacizumab and 1 session of 800 scattered laser spots. The left eye underwent a full 1600 laser panretinal photocoagulation
Genovesi‐Ebert 2007 Not a randomised clinical trial
Gonzalez 2006 RCT assessed the efficacy and safety of pegaptanib in treating diabetic macular oedema and diabetic retinopathy. The publication was an abstract and there was insufficient information to include the study. The principal focus is of participants with macular oedema
Hattori 2010 Not a randomised clinical trial
Huang 2009 Compared with historical controls. Not randomised
Ip 2012 2 years of follow‐up to evaluate effects of intravitreal ranibizumab on diabetic retinopathy severity over time in 2 phase 3 clinical trials (RIDE, NCT00473382; RISE, NCT00473330) for diabetic macular oedema
Jiang 2009 Retrospective study
Jorge 2006 Non‐randomised study
Lanzagorta‐Aresti 2009 The included participants did not have proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The outcomes measured were central macular thickness and visual acuity in participants with a moderate retinopathy not proliferative that needed a cataract surgery
López‐López 2012 Anti‐VEGF group was not randomised
Michaelides 2010 Focus of the clinical trial was diabetic macular oedema
Minnella 2008 Non‐controlled clinical trial
Scott 2008 Study evaluated agreement in diabetic retinopathy severity classification by retina specialists performing ophthalmoscopy vs. reading centre grading of 7‐field
 stereoscopic fundus photographs in a phase 2 clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab for centre‐involved diabetic macular oedema
Shin 2009 Data were collected retrospectively
Stergiou 2007 Retrospective case series
Tonello 2008 Quote: "for patients (n= 8) presenting with high‐risk PDR [proliferative diabetic retinopathy] in both eyes, the eye with worse BCVA [best‐corrected visual acuity] was selected to receive PRP [panretinal photocoagulation] plus intravitreal bevacizumab (eight eyes) and the fellow eye was treated with PRP alone (eight eyes)"
Comment: clinical trial partially randomised
Yeh 2009 Not a randomised study. The treatment assignment was alternative
Zhou 2010 Focus of the clinical trial is diabetic macular oedema