Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Arimura 2009 | Retrospective, comparative study |
Fulda 2010 | Not a randomised clinical trial. Each participant received the 2 evaluated interventions. The right eye received intravitreal bevacizumab and 1 session of 800 scattered laser spots. The left eye underwent a full 1600 laser panretinal photocoagulation |
Genovesi‐Ebert 2007 | Not a randomised clinical trial |
Gonzalez 2006 | RCT assessed the efficacy and safety of pegaptanib in treating diabetic macular oedema and diabetic retinopathy. The publication was an abstract and there was insufficient information to include the study. The principal focus is of participants with macular oedema |
Hattori 2010 | Not a randomised clinical trial |
Huang 2009 | Compared with historical controls. Not randomised |
Ip 2012 | 2 years of follow‐up to evaluate effects of intravitreal ranibizumab on diabetic retinopathy severity over time in 2 phase 3 clinical trials (RIDE, NCT00473382; RISE, NCT00473330) for diabetic macular oedema |
Jiang 2009 | Retrospective study |
Jorge 2006 | Non‐randomised study |
Lanzagorta‐Aresti 2009 | The included participants did not have proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The outcomes measured were central macular thickness and visual acuity in participants with a moderate retinopathy not proliferative that needed a cataract surgery |
López‐López 2012 | Anti‐VEGF group was not randomised |
Michaelides 2010 | Focus of the clinical trial was diabetic macular oedema |
Minnella 2008 | Non‐controlled clinical trial |
Scott 2008 | Study evaluated agreement in diabetic retinopathy severity classification by retina specialists performing ophthalmoscopy vs. reading centre grading of 7‐field stereoscopic fundus photographs in a phase 2 clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab for centre‐involved diabetic macular oedema |
Shin 2009 | Data were collected retrospectively |
Stergiou 2007 | Retrospective case series |
Tonello 2008 | Quote: "for patients (n= 8) presenting with high‐risk PDR [proliferative diabetic retinopathy] in both eyes, the eye with worse BCVA [best‐corrected visual acuity] was selected to receive PRP [panretinal photocoagulation] plus intravitreal bevacizumab (eight eyes) and the fellow eye was treated with PRP alone (eight eyes)" Comment: clinical trial partially randomised |
Yeh 2009 | Not a randomised study. The treatment assignment was alternative |
Zhou 2010 | Focus of the clinical trial is diabetic macular oedema |