Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 28;11(2):437–451. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00745-5

Table 2.

Clinical variables and use of oral antidiabetics at index date in total patient population and by age subgroup

Clinical variables and OAD use Age subgroups Total patient population (N = 2709; 100%)
30–64 years (n = 1214; 44.8%) ≥ 65 years (n = 1495; 55.2%)
HbA1c, %
 Mean level (SD) 9.5 (1.5) 9.0 (1.1) 9.2 (1.3)
 Median level (95% CI) 9.0 (9.4–9.6) 8.7 (8.9–9.1) 8.8 (9.1–9.3)
 Percentage of patients with HbA1c of:
  8.0–8.9% (95% CI) 49.3% (46.5–52.1%) 63.6% (61.2–66.0%) 57.2% (55.3–59.1%)
  9.0–9.9% (95% CI) 25.3% (22.9–27.7%) 23.7% (21.5–25.7%) 24.4% (22.8–26.0%)
  ≥ 10.0% (95% CI) 25.4% (23.0–27.8%) 12.7% (11.0–14.4%) 18.4% (16.9–19.9%)
BMI, kg/m2 (SD; 95% CI) 32.1 (0.9; 32.0–32.2) 32.0 (1.0; 31.9–32.1) 32.1 (0.9; 32.0–32.2)
OADs
 Mean, n (SD) 2.2 (0.4) 2.4 (0.6) 2.3 (0.5)
 Median, n (95% CI) 2.0 (2.1–2.3) 2.0 (2.3–2.5) 2.0 (2.2–2.4)
 Percentage of patients with 2 OADs (95% CI) 85.6% (83.6–87.6%) 69.7% (67.4–72.0%) 76.8% (75.2–78.4%)
  Met + SU 72.9% (70.4–75.4%) 55.5% (53.0–58.0%) 63.3% (61.4–65.0%)
  Met + IDPP4 7.4% (5.9–8.9%) 10.1% (8.6–11.6%) 8.9% (7.8–10.0%)
  Other combinations 5.3% (4.0–6.6%) 4.1% (3.1–5.1%) 4.6% (3.8–5.4%)
 Percentage of patients with 3 OADs (95% CI) 13.3% (11.4–15.2%) 24.9% (22.7–27.1%) 19.7% (18.2–21.2%)
  Met + SU + IDPP4 7.2% (5.7–8.7%) 14.4% (12.6–16.2%) 11.2% (10.0–12.4%)
  Met + SU + glitazones 5.7% (4.4–7.0%) 10.2% (8.7–11.7%) 8.2% (7.2–9.2%)
  Other 0.3% (0.0–0.6%) 0.3% (0.0–0.5%) 0.3% (0.1–0.5%)
 Percentage of patients with 4 OADs (95%CI) 1.2% (0.6–1.8) 5.4% (4.3–6.5%) 3.3% (2.9–4.3%)
  Met + SU + glitazones + IDPP4 1.0% (0.4–1.6%) 4.0% (3.0–5.0%) 2.3% (1.7–2.9%)
  Other combinations 0.2% (0.0–0.6%) 1.4% (0.8–2.0%) 1.2% (0.8–1.6%)

OAD oral antidiabetics, HbA1c glycosylated haemoglobin (%), BMI body mass index (kg/m2)

Met Metformin, SU sulfonylureas, IDDP4 dipeptyl peptidase 4 inhibitors

Values expressed as percentages, mean (SD: standard deviation), 95% CI; confidence interval