Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 11;3(4):bjgpopen19X101666. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101666

Table 3. Efficacy outcomes: analyses of covariance.

ANCOVAa for t1 score ANCOVAa for t2 score
n Regression co-efficient Partial eta squared b n Regression co-efficient Partial eta squared
( 95% CI ) ( 95% CI ) c ( 95% CI ) ( 95% CI ) b
DCS PDA 23 -3.5 (-12.6 to 5.6) 0.014 (0.000 to 0.143)
No PDA 23
EPDS PDA 23 1.4 (-1.6 to 4.5) 0.020 (0.000 to 0.158) 21 -1.3 (-4.1 to 1.5) 0.021 (0.000 to 0.163)
No PDA 23 23
STAI (state) PDA 23 5.1 (1.0 to 11.3) 0.062 (0.000 to 0.230) 20 -3.8 (-11.4 to 3.8) 0.025 (0.000 to 0.174)
No PDA 23 23
Knowledge questionnaire PDA 23 0.13 (-0.86 to 1.1) 0.002 (0.000 to 0.090)
No PDA 23

aANCOVA model of effect of allocation, adjusted for baseline score of the relevant outcome measure. bStandardised effect sizes were estimated using partial eta squared (by convention, values of 0.01, 0.09, and 0.25 indicate small, medium, and large effect sizes respectively). cThe lower limit of the confidence interval was estimated as 0.0 for all analyses.

ANCOVA = analysis of covariance. CI = confidence intervals. DCS = decisional conflict scale. EPDS = Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. PDA = patient decision aid. STAI = state-trait anxiety inventory.