Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;2020(1):CD006282. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006282.pub5

7. Oral phenylbutyrate versus placebo outcomes (Mercuri 2007).

  Phenylbutyrate Placebo Difference (95% CI) P value
All ages
Number of participants randomised 54 53
Number (%) of participants evaluable for analysis of HFMS 45 (83%) 45 (85%)
Mean (SD) HFMS 12.1 (9.60) 12.8 (9.86) ‐0.7 (‐4.78 to 3.78) 0.70
Mean (SD) change in HFMSa 0.60 (0.22) 0.73 (0.29) ‐0.13 (‐0.84 to 0.58) 0.70
Age > 5 years
Mean (SD) change in muscle strength arm megascore (dynamometry)a 1.56 (6.94) ‐0.42 (8.61) 1.98 (‐1.67 to 5.63) 0.74
Mean (SD) change muscle strength leg megascore (dynamometry)a 4.26 (8.64) 3.22 (6.26) 1.04 (‐2.46 to 4.54) 0.78
Number (%) of participants evaluable for analysis of HFMS 26 (48%) 23 (43%)
Mean (SD) change in pulmonary function (FVC % of predicted value in litres)a 0.03 (0.17) ‐0.01 (0.27) 0.04 (‐0.07 to 0.15) 0.39
  Phenylbutyrate Placebo Risk ratio (95% CI) P value
All ages
Number of participants with adverse events 19 5 3.1 (1.25 to 7.84) 0.01
Number of withdrawals because of adverse events 6 3 1.86 (0.49 to 7.11) 0.9
Number of severe adverse events 1 2
Number of participants with severe adverse events 1 2 1.96 (0.18 to 21.0) 1.0

CI: confidence interval; FVC: forced vital capacity; HFMS: Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale; SD: standard deviation;

aMean change from baseline.