Bertini 2017.
Methods | Randomised, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial | |
Participants | 165 non‐ambulatory participants with SMA types II or IIIa aged 3–25 years Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | Oral liquid olesoxime (TRO19622: cholest‐4‐en‐3‐one, oxime) 10 mg/kg once a day or placebo Treatment duration: 24 months |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcome: change over 24 months in functional outcome score D1+D2 of MFM Secondary outcomes: change in total MFM score, HFMS, electrophysiological measures (CMAP and MUNE), pulmonary function (FVC), quality of life (PedsQL), and Global Clinical Impression from baseline, responder analysis of MFM, laboratory assessments, ECG and adverse events |
|
Funding | AFM‐Téléthon and Trophos SA (a wholly owned member of the Hoffmann La Roche Group since 2015) | |
Conflicts of interest | Several investigators declared grants and consultancy fees from Hoffmann La Roche, Trophos and other commercial entities. 8 investigators were current or former employees of Trophos or Hoffmann La Roche, 3 were stockholders and 2 authors were named on a patent pending for olesoxime. Roche also funded medical writing support. | |
Notes | ClinicalTrials.gov id: NCT01302600 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomly assigned, centrally generated with validated randomisation software (SAS version 9.2). |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated allocation by independent statistician. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and all investigators, site personal and sponsor study personal was ensured. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and all investigators, site personal and sponsor study personal was ensured. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | 17 participants withdrew for unknown reasons. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Data were dichotomised post hoc. Investigators were employees of the pharmaceutical company and they were involved in data collection and analysis. |
Other bias | High risk | Primary outcome measure was used in 2 different forms (MFM‐32 and MFM‐20) and, therefore, not truly comparable. Treatment groups have differences in included age ranges. |