Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;2020(1):CD006282. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006282.pub5

Bertini 2017.

Methods Randomised, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial
Participants 165 non‐ambulatory participants with SMA types II or IIIa aged 3–25 years
Inclusion criteria:
  • genetic diagnosis of SMA with homozygous deletion of SMN1 exon 7, or a heterozygous deletion accompanied by a point mutation on the other allele

  • MFM relative score (percentage of the maximum sum of both dimensions) of ≥ 15% (functional domain 1 (D1) plus functional domain 2 (D2) score)

  • HFMS score at baseline 3–38 (non‐ambulatory); onset of symptoms at ≤ 3 years of age

  • ability to take the study treatment (tested at screening after informed consent)


Exclusion criteria:
  • evidence of renal dysfunction, blood dysplasia, hepatic insufficiency, symptomatic pancreatitis

  • congenital heart defect

  • history of metabolic acidosis

  • hypertension

  • significant central nervous system impairment, or neurodegenerative or neuromuscular disease other than SMA

  • any clinically significant ECG abnormality

  • use of medications intended for the treatment of SMA

  • inability to meet study visit requirements or co‐operate reliably with functional testing

  • surgical spinal rod or fixation for scoliosis within the past 6 months or anticipated need of rod or fixation within 6 months of enrolment

Interventions Oral liquid olesoxime (TRO19622: cholest‐4‐en‐3‐one, oxime) 10 mg/kg once a day or placebo
Treatment duration: 24 months
Outcomes Primary outcome: change over 24 months in functional outcome score D1+D2 of MFM
Secondary outcomes: change in total MFM score, HFMS, electrophysiological measures (CMAP and MUNE), pulmonary function (FVC), quality of life (PedsQL), and Global Clinical Impression from baseline, responder analysis of MFM, laboratory assessments, ECG and adverse events
Funding AFM‐Téléthon and Trophos SA (a wholly owned member of the Hoffmann La Roche Group since 2015)
Conflicts of interest Several investigators declared grants and consultancy fees from Hoffmann La Roche, Trophos and other commercial entities. 8 investigators were current or former employees of Trophos or Hoffmann La Roche, 3 were stockholders and 2 authors were named on a patent pending for olesoxime. Roche also funded medical writing support.
Notes ClinicalTrials.gov id: NCT01302600
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomly assigned, centrally generated with validated randomisation software (SAS version 9.2).
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated allocation by independent statistician.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of participants and all investigators, site personal and sponsor study personal was ensured.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of participants and all investigators, site personal and sponsor study personal was ensured.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 17 participants withdrew for unknown reasons.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Data were dichotomised post hoc. Investigators were employees of the pharmaceutical company and they were involved in data collection and analysis.
Other bias High risk Primary outcome measure was used in 2 different forms (MFM‐32 and MFM‐20) and, therefore, not truly comparable. Treatment groups have differences in included age ranges.