Mercuri 2007.
Methods | Randomised, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial | |
Participants | 107 participants who fulfilled international classification criteria for SMA type II Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | Phenylbutyrate 500 mg/kg/day 7 days orally, divided in 5 doses using an intermittent schedule (7 days on and 7 days off) or placebo Duration of treatment: 3 months Follow‐up: 3 months |
|
Outcomes | Functional score (HFMS), change in functional score. Subgroup aged > 5 years: change in muscle strength arm and leg (myometry), change in pulmonary function (FVC), adverse events | |
Funding | Financial support from Famiglie SMA, Italy and Associazione per lo Studio delle Atrofie Spinali Musculari Infantili (ASAMSI) Fyrklövern Scandinavia AB, Sweden provided triButyrate Medication provided by pharmaceutical company, but no details about the involvement of the company in study procedures. |
|
Conflicts of interest | Quote: "The authors report no conflicts of interest." | |
Notes | Muscle strength was measured bilaterally for elbow flexion, hand grip and 3‐point pinch. Muscle strength was measured bilaterally for knee flexion and knee extension. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomly assigned. Central allocation. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central allocation. Only randomisation unit and pharmacy had access to assignment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Only randomisation unit and pharmacy had access to assignment. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Only randomisation unit and pharmacy had access to assignment. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Myometry and FVC were measured in children aged > 5 years, but a different number of children were reported in the 2 groups. No report on explaining this difference. Unclear reports on adverse events. Quote: "The efficacy analyses were conducted according to the original randomization assignment (intention to treat), using the last observation carried forward approach for missing follow‐up data" |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | There was clear evidence that reported results corresponded to all intended outcome measurements. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other bias identified |