Swoboda 2010.
Methods | Randomised, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial | |
Participants | 61 non‐ambulatory participants with SMA types II or III Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | Oral liquid carnitine 50 mg/kg/day in 2 doses in combination with oral valproic acid capsules in 2–3 doses to maintain overnight serum level trough 50–100 mg/dL or liquid placebo twice daily in combination with placebo capsule 2–3 times a day Duration of treatment: 12 months in active treatment and 6 months in placebo group. The placebo group switched to active treatment after 6 months per protocol Total follow‐up: 12 months |
|
Outcomes | Primary: safety, motor function assessments, change in functional score (MHFMS) Secondary: include change in quality of life (PedsQL), change in innervation via maximum ulnar CMAP, adverse events. Change in muscle strength and change in pulmonary function were measured in participants aged ≥ 5 years |
|
Funding | Quote: "Abbott Pharmaceutical provided VPA [valproic acid] and placebo, and Sigma‐Tau Pharmaceutical provided L‐carnitine, at no cost." | |
Conflicts of interest | Quote: "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist." | |
Notes | Baseline differences in body mass index and gender between the different treatment groups. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomly assigned using a permuted block design balancing for institution. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation was performed using a permuted block design balancing for institution. Randomisation was performed centrally by telephone. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and key study personnel. Medical monitor was unblinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and key study personnel. Medical monitor was unblinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not all outcome measures are available for analysis. Missing data were not fully explained. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Protocol available. There was clear evidence that reported results correspond to all intended outcome measurements. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Partial cross‐over design after 6 months. |