Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;1(8):481–492. doi: 10.1096/fba.2019-00018

Table 2.

Acceptance criteria and recommendations for miR quantification using SYBR® Green assay in RT‐qPCR

Parameter Acceptance criteria Recommendations/ comments
PCR Efficiency 90%‐110%

Absolute quantification: 100 ± 10%

Semi‐quantification (eg, comparative quantification of extracellular miR level): ±10% of the mean of batches to be compared; mean does not necessarily have to be 100%

Slope of standard curve −3.1 to −3.6 Slope up to −4.1 is acceptable, when it is constant within batches to be compared
Correlation coefficient (R2) ≥ 0.98 Correlation coefficient lower than 1 result in inaccuracy quantification of at least one calibration standard
Linearity see R 2 Within calibration range of extracellular miR concentrations; Aa [%] of calculation standards ± 30%, but can be higher when R 2 < 1.0
Specificity Tmb ± 1°C Melting curve analysis of all batches
Sensitivity ALLOQ c ≤ 30% Accuracy of standard curve can be higher when R2 < 1.0
Repeatability

CVd ≤ 25%

CVLLOQ ≤ 30%

CV of quantified concentrations, not Cq‐values
Reproducibility

CV ≤ 35%

CVLLOQ ≤ 40%

CV of quantified concentrations, not Cq‐values
Trueness AQC ± 30% Accuracy of low QCse is not within acceptance criteria
a

Accuracy.

b

Melting temperature.

c

Lower limit of quantification.

d

Coefficient of variation.

e

Quality control.