Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 12;1(4):227–245. doi: 10.1096/fba.2018-00035

Table 1.

Echocardiographic and anatomical analysis as a function of transverse aortic constriction (TAC). Statistical analysis was performed with a two‐way ANOVA analysis

Time post surgery 4 wk
Genotype HMGB1Flox Sham HMGB1ΔMac Sham HMGB1Flox + TAC HMGB1ΔMac + TAC
Echocardiographic parameters
LVEDD (mm) 3.443 ± 0.12 3.435 ± 0.11 4.018 ± 0.15** 3.846 ± 0.12**
LVESD (mm) 1.955 ± 0.09 1.98 ± 0.12 2.604 ± 0.22* 2.39 ± 0.16*
FS (%) 43.25 ± 1.93 42.25 ± 1.79 36.25 ± 3.29 38.36 ± 2.37
Anatomical parameters
BW (g) 31.94 ± 0.54 30.49 ± 1.25 27.29 ± 0.90** 28.73 ± 0.69**
Heart weight (mg) 144.3 ± 7.14 152 ± 3.51 169.5 ± 11.21* 174.3 ± 6.38*
HW/TL (mg/mm) 78.27 ± 3.81 82.51 ± 1.70 97.8 ± 6.22** 98.6 ± 3.64**

Data are expressed as means ± SEM. n = 4 in HMGB1Flox/sham group; n = 4 in HMGB1ΔMac/sham group; n = 8 in HMGB1Flox/TAC group; n = 13 in HMGB1ΔMac/TAC group.

BW, body weight; FS, fractional shortening; HMGB1, high mobility group B1; HW/TL, heart weight to tíbia length ratio; LVEDD, left ventricular end‐diastolic dimension; LVESD, left ventricular end‐systolic dimension; TAC, transverse aortic constriction.

*

P < 0.05.

**

P < 0.01 vs sham/TAC.