Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 11;102(2):153–159. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0106

Table 1.

Patient demographic details from all studies.

Study Procedure type Patients (n) Age (years) Female gender, n (%) Body mass index (kg/m2)
Standard suture Barbed suture Standard suture Barbed suture Standard suture Barbed suture Standard suture Barbed suture
Bracale20 Colorectal 40 40 74.1 ± 9.9 72.5 ± 11.2 17 (43) 12 (30) 30.6 ± 7.5 30 ± 7.9
Costantino16 LRYGB 76 219 40 ± 10.7 38 ± 10.8 63 (83) 213 (97) 44 ± 6.5 44.9 ± 6.9
De Blasi17 LRYGB 50 50 42.4 ± 10.6 43.7 ± 12.1 44.7 ± 7.6 44.0 ± 4.5
Feroci21 Colorectal 47 47 69 (43–94) 72.5 (52–87) 22 (47) 27 (57) 24.20 (20–29) 25 (18–30)
Gys14 LRYGB 100 100 38.9 40.4 F : M ratio 2.8 F : M ratio 4.0 40.8 40.5
Milone15 SAGB 30 30 35.1 ± 9.3 36.5 ± 6.8 9 (30) 12 (40) 46.4 ± 3.3 45.8 ± 3.5
Pennestri:18
 LRYGB LRYGB 244 244 42 (35–49) 43 (35–50) 179 (73) 182 (74) 43.3 (40.3–47.3) 43.8 (40.5–47.4)
 SAGB SAGB 24 24 42 (35.25–47.75) 46 (25.25–53.50) 17 (70.8) 16 (67) 45.8 (42.1–50.7) 49.3 (42.3–52.2)
Tyner19 LRYGB 38 46 46.3 ± 9.8 48.3 ± 11.9 35 (89.5) 41 (89.1) 41.3 ± 4.7 41.9 ± 5.3
Vidarsson22 LRYGB 22795 2211 40.9 ± 11.2 41.0 ± 11.6 17142 (75) 1694 (77) 42.3 ± 5.2 41.3 ± 5.1

F, female; LRYGB, laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass; M, male; SAGB, single anastomosis gastric bypass.