Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 17;40:21–27.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.10.001

Table 2.

Estimates of the adjusted prevalence ratio of recent, local transmission by neighborhood-level and individual-level factors.

Factor Model 1
PR (95%)
P Model 2
PR (95%)
P
Race/Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic Black 3.97 (1.80, 8.73) <0.0001 1.77 (0.97, 3.22) 0.0722
Asian 1.87 (0.64, 5.45) 1.66 (0.72, 3.83)
Hispanic 2.47 (0.87, 7.04) 1.25 (0.59, 2.64)
Non-Hispanic White Ref. Ref.
Gender
Male 1.19 (0.86, 1.64) 0.3000 1.12 (0.87, 1.45) 0.3811
Female Ref. Ref.
Nativity
U.S. 3.54 (1.87, 6.72) 0.0001 2.14 (1.27, 3.60) 0.0044
Foreign-B Ref. Ref.
Age Category
< 18 years 0.31 (0.12, 0.71) 0.0013 0.37 (0.18, 0.76) <0.0001
65+ years 0.73 (0.37, 1.43) 0.84 (0.46, 1.52)
18-64 years Ref. Ref.
Neighborhood Density
Q4 1.28 (0.86, 1.89) 0.5300
Q3 1.09 (0.72, 1.65)
Q2 1.08 (0.70, 1.67)
Q1 Ref.
Neighborhood Poverty*
Q4 13.78 (4.76, 39.87) <0.0001
Q3 8.07 (2.82, 23.10)
Q2 3.25 (1.07, 9.93)
Q1 Ref.

Results based on modified Poisson models with GEE. P-values reflect the type 3 analysis effects.

*

Higher quartiles reflect greater poverty or higher density.

Model 1 considers only individual-level demographic characteristics. In Model 2, neighborhood density and poverty are added as covariates.