. 2019 Sep 26;39(3):e101625. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019101625

Table 1.

Summary of the phenotypic analysis of ASY1 variants

Construct	Chromosome association	Background	Seed/silique	Pollen viability (%)
–	–	Wild type	58.35 ± 1.75^a	99.32 ± 0.49^a
–	–	asy1	9 ± 1.2^b	55.57 ± 2.55^b
ASY1	Correct	asy1	58.75 ± 2.32^a	99.26 ± 0.63^a
ASY1^T142V	Compromised	asy1	41 ± 2.5^c	81.87 ± 2.35^c
ASY1^T184V	Correct	asy1	57.78 ± 2.5^a	99.24 ± 0.27^a
ASY1^T142V;T184V	Largely lost	asy1	9.78 ± 1.8^b	59.72 ± 2.27^b
ASY1^3V	Correct	asy1	57.75 ± 1.83^a	99.38 ± 0.4^a
ASY1^4V	Correct	asy1	58.15 ± 1.96^a	99.04 ± 0.25^a
ASY1^5V	Largely lost	asy1	9 ± 1.41^b	55.86 ± 3.57^b
ASY1^T142D	Correct	asy1	57.95 ± 2.3^a	99.21 ± 0.23^a
ASY1^T142S	Correct	asy1	56 ± 2.96^a	98.19 ± 0.9^a

The level of significance (P < 0.05) is indicated by different letters between the wild‐type and ASY1 variants as determined by the one‐way ANOVA followed by Turkey's test.