Abstract
Purpose of review
Family caregivers of patients with cancer often spend a great deal of effort on physically and emotionally demanding work while taking care of patients. However, the majority of caregivers are not properly equipped for their role as caregivers, which may lead to increased distress in both caregivers and patients. Herein, we reviewed the recent literature (last three years) examining online interventions that seek to support caregiver resilience and decrease distress.
Recent findings
Our search identified interventions involving three main themes: informational support, positive activities, and social support. These are mostly in the form of web-based tools and mobile apps targeting both usability and quality of life (QOL). Social network services (SNS) is also considered in this review as a new environment for caregivers to connect with other individuals with lived experience in similar circumstances.
Summary
Existing studies on online interventions to support caregivers is still at a formative development stage and pilot tests of feasibility, rather than a substantive body of randomized controlled trials to assess the impact in different user populations, or to determine specific factors that impact caregiver distress level or resilience. More research is needed to further assess the long-term effects of online interventions on caregiver stress and resilience. Also, the role of different types of social network services and new forms of interaction, such as conversational agents, has not yet been fully investigated in caregiver populations. Future research should strive to seek new modes of providing services that may present novel opportunities to enhance caregiver resilience and reduce distress.
Keywords: Family caregiver, cancer, mHealth, online interventions, stress, wellbeing
INTRODUCTION
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), cancer is the second leading cause of death in the US. However, the rate of cancer-related death has dropped by 26% in the last 30 years (1). With this continuous increase in cancer survival, there is a concomitant rising number of caregivers who provide long-term care for their loved ones who live with cancer and ongoing treatment or survivorship.
Family caregivers are the individuals who provide care for their family or friends, typically unpaid, in domestic settings (2). These caregivers often spend a great deal of time and effort on both physically and emotionally demanding work, such as forming treatment regimens, managing medications, coordinating regular clinic visits, and engaging with healthcare providers in clinical conversations (3,4). These significant demands result in a range of problems for caregivers, including financial issues (5), social isolation (6), poor sleep patterns and depression (7,8). These negative effects can last for a long period of time, even well after the patient’s death (9,10).
Despite such physical, practical and emotional demands on their lives and time, caregivers of patients with cancer are expected to adjust to these changes. However, a majority of family caregivers report inadequate support in providing long-term patient care. They are often viewed as the ‘invisible’ workforce that provides care for the patients, and their roles are often hidden and under-recognized within the healthcare system (11*). Because most caregivers are not sufficiently equipped with skills and information to provide care for their patients, they often suffer from symptoms of depression and anxiety, which impacts their ability to concentrate (12,13) and therefore function optimally. Furthermore, caregiver symptoms have been found to concurrently impact patient clinical and mental health outcomes, given the heavy reliance on caregivers for managing patient symptoms and providing support (14). As a result, there is an increasing demand for understanding and meeting caregivers’ needs through the application of caregiver-focused tools or instruments that provide information and support for a wide range of problems including psychological (15).
Technology-mediated interventions, including telemedicine, mHealth, and social media applications, have become commonplace in and accepted by the healthcare environment (16**, 18). Recent studies have highlighted the benefits of using online interventions to support caregiver resilience and assist in managing caregiver stress (15,17*). Over 35% of the population has access to a smartphone, and Statista anticipates the smartphone adoption rate to increase to 40% worldwide by 2021 (19). A recent survey of 112 caregivers indicated that most caregivers have high access to technology and the Internet (20). The younger caregivers (aged 18–64) stated that they expect more benefits from technology-mediated tools, and caregivers older than 65 years also believed that such technologies would help reduce their caregiving burdens. Recent systematic reviews on technology-mediated interventions designed for supporting family caregivers reported improvements in their targeted caregiving practice areas even though many interventions were still in exploratory phases (16). Studies highlight the need for targeted research hypotheses, although effectiveness for specific interventions and measures has been demonstrated (21**,22**), for example, self-compassion and mindful awareness have been shown to enhance caregiver coping (23).
Online interventions enable caregivers to easily access useful resources and participate in a variety of simple activities using their personal devices, such as smartphones or tablets. These interventions can serve as information resources (24,25*), enable access to healthcare teams (26), and provide an outlet for emotional ventilation through peer-to-peer interactions in various health contexts, including dementia, diabetes, and health failure (27,28). With online health interventions designed to provide support, regardless of time and place, caregivers can access such services with relatively less time and effort than traditional interventions.
Although the benefits of technology and the ways to effectively disseminate online interventions to caregivers is accepted by the healthcare system, only a limited number of evidence-based interventions are available. This gap is even more pronounced in long-term follow-up cancer care or survivorship settings. Previously conducted studies largely focused on the supportive needs of caregivers in the context of home palliative care or end-of-life care (9) rather than caregivers in long-term follow-up cancer care or survivorship. Therefore, the field has a limited understanding of the current status of online interventions designed to alleviate psychological burden and distress for many cancer caregivers, particularly across the trajectory of care, including into survivorship.
Herein, we reviewed the current status of online interventions designed to support informal/family caregivers during long-term cancer treatment and survivorship. By synthesizing the most recent and relevant studies, this review identified trends in the field and suggested future opportunities for supporting cancer caregivers with enhanced coping, resilience, psychological wellness, information, reduced distress, and social support.
METHODS
The purpose of this study was to review the most recent articles on online interventions that aim to alleviate informal/family caregiver distress and support their resilience. We searched for articles archived under PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar using various combinations of the following search terms: family/informal/caregiver, cancer/oncology, mHealth/online/internet/technology/digital health, and resilience/depression/distress/stress. Additional articles were also identified from the recent systematic reviews on technology-mediated interventions that aim to support caregivers. The current study was not aimed at providing a systematic review of the topic. Our search aimed to offer an overview of the most relevant literature on caregiver supporting intervention in cancer context and was limited to studies that explicitly mentioned caregiver’s stress and resilience support as their main study goal and were published within last three years. We acknowledge that the search was not exhaustive, and there may be other articles that were not included in our review.
RESULTS
Search Results and Data Analysis
In the following sections, we provide an overview of the state of the current caregiving studies to improve resilience and alleviate stress. The authors regularly discussed included studies to understand consistent themes and group them into overarching categories. We categorized the identified articles into three main themes: (1) knowledge and information; (2) positive psychological activities; and (3) social support. Please see Table 1 for the summary of current online interventions for caregivers of cancer patients.
Table 1.
Summary of current online interventions for caregivers of cancer patients
Reference | Authors (Date) | Population | Sample Size | Study Design | Types of Interventions | Major Outcome Variables (Caregiver) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[25] | Blackstone et al. (2019) | Distance caregivers at outpatient ambulatory clinics | 332 patients -caregiver dyads | Randomized controlled trial | Personalized coaching sessions via videoconference | Caregiver’s distress, anxiety, depression, burden, self‐efficacy, and emotional support |
[34] | Canter et al. (2019) | Caregivers of cancer patients | 17 caregivers (phase1)/5 caregivers, (phase3)/4 caregivers (phase4) | Four phased participatory process; (a) creating the multifamily video discussion group (MFVDG) and other video contents, (b) developing the initial prototype, (c) Think Aloud testing, and (d) beta testing | Interactive website | Acceptability, feasibility, usability of the intervention, and website usage data |
[35] | Chaar et al. (2019) | Caregivers of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) | 24 caregivers | Semi-structured interview | Mobile app | Experiences of being a caregiver, effective stress relieving strategies, and perceived benefits of simple positive psychological activities |
[40] | Fallon et al. (2018) | Caregivers and patients engaged in American Cancer Society’s Cancer Survivors Network (CSN) | 4,762 caregivers and patients with cancer | Online opt-in self-report survey | Online social networking community | CSN use and perceived value of features, health, health behavior, and cancer experiences |
[33] | Kubo et al. (2019) | Cancer patients who received chemotherapy and their caregivers | 97 patients undergone chemotherapy and 31 caregivers | Randomized controlled trial | Mobile/online (mHealth) intervention | Retention rate, adherence, participant-reported measures, distress, anxiety and depression, pain, sleep quality, quality of life, fatigue, posttraumatic growth, mindfulness, and post-intervention interview |
[21] | Marzorati et al. (2018) | Caregivers of adult cancer patients | 24 studies that include a technology-mediated intervention for caregivers of adult cancer patients | Systematic review | Telehealth interventions (web-based platforms and telephone calls) | N/A |
[22] | Ploeg et al. (2018) | Caregivers of patients with chronic conditions | 14 studies on web-based interventions, compared with no or minimal Web-based interventions, on caregiver outcomes | Systematic review and Meta-analysis | Web-based platforms | N/A |
[16] | Shin et al. (2018) | Caregivers of patients with cancer | 18 studies published on the support of cancer caregivers with health technology | Literature review | Mobile interventions and web-based platforms | N/A |
[26] | Slater et al. (2018) | Families of patients with cancer | 9 staff and 6 caregivers in oncology settings | Interview, analyzed download metrics | Mobile app | Feasibility, and usability of the intervention |
[30] | Struthers-Montford et al. (2017) | Male spouse of patients with breast cancer | 40 women with breast cancer - spouse dyads | Randomized controlled trial, mixed methods, concurrent feasibility study | Web-based platform | General self-efficacy, caregiver guilt, quality of life, and feasibility |
[39] | Wang et al. (2018) | Parents of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia | 101 caregivers | Quasi-experimental pre- and post- design study | Mobile app | Anxiety, depressive disorder, perceived social support, burden of care, parents’ perception of uncertainty in illness, quality of life, and parents’ existing knowledge and knowledge needs |
Knowledge and Information: Support Caregivers with Resources
Caregivers are often faced with an overwhelming amount of clinical information and rely heavily on healthcare providers to help them understand complex information (29). Information delivery and resource sharing through online interventions, such as home video conferencing, web-based tools, and mobile apps are considered as beneficial as in-person interactions with healthcare providers.
For example, videoconference technology has been used to alleviate the emotional burden in caregivers. Blackstone et al. conducted a randomized controlled trial with 332 patient‐distance caregiver dyads in 32 outpatient cancer centers to understand the effectiveness of a video conferencing intervention on caregiver and patient’s distress, anxiety, depression, burden, self‐efficacy, and emotional support (25*). The study particularly addressed the barriers of distance caregivers who live one hour apart from patients. The video conference intervention was designed to provide participants with four personalized coaching sessions via videoconference. Resources provided during the coaching sessions included information support, such as useful communication strategies with close others and self-care techniques. Outcome variables were measured at baseline, four months, and six months. The study is currently ongoing; the intervention has received positive feedback from participants and clinicians. However, situational details that caregivers may encounter (e.g., waiting time at the clinic, technology literacy, quality of wireless connections) were pointed out as future considerations that must be addressed to draw successful adoption of the intervention.
Also, a randomized-controlled trial with a qualitative interview component investigated the effectiveness of an intervention designed to support quality-of-life (QOL) of male spouses of female breast cancer patients (30*). Participants assigned to the treatment group were able to access the web-based Male Transition Toolkit (MaTT) intervention for four-weeks. Six specific themes were addressed, including common changes to expect, important health information, and other resources. Generally, participants in the intervention group found MaTT to be helpful in reducing their distress and also easy-to-use. Even though caregiver’s QOL scores were not significantly decreased, the intervention was perceived to be acceptable and feasible with ease-of-use. The study pointed out that the frequency and duration of engagement with the intervention should be further investigated.
Similarly, the Oncology Family App was designed to support the caregivers of cancer patients (26**). The app provided useful phone numbers, links to the maps for statewide hospitals, and emergency contacts in an easy-to-access manner. The app also provided access to patients and families for reviewing lab test results to understand their current situations. In an iterative user-centered approach, caregivers, patients, and clinicians were involved in the development process. Further studies will be conducted to measure short- and long-term effects of the app in the treatment process and caregiver and patients’ perceptions.
Positive Psychological Activities: Promoting Caregiver Well-being
Participating in an in-person class is often challenging for patients with cancer and their caregivers, due to time constraints and other restrictions. To alleviate these issues, recent studies provide online-based simple activities, such as meditation, through mobile apps and websites. Simply engaging in these activities has been shown to generate a positive mindset and confidence for individuals about their ability to cope with a challenging situation and manage negative feelings (31,32).
Kubo et al. investigated the effectiveness of an online-based/mobile app that provided meditation guidelines for caregivers and patients who were undergoing chemotherapy (33**). Participants were asked to engage in the daily basis program for 10–20 minutes throughout the 8-week study period. To enhance understanding, short (1–2 minute) information videos were provided every few days. Participants’ distress, anxiety and depression, sleep quality, fatigue, and mental and physical domains of HRQOL were measured. Nine caregivers also completed the post-intervention phone interview. Although there were no significant changes in anxiety, sleep quality, and mental health (specific domain of HRQOL measure), caregivers reported decreased stress, depression, and fatigue, and improved physical health (specific domain of HRQOL measure). Overall, the results showed that the mindfulness intervention was effective and well-used by participants.
Another study applied user-centered approaches in developing a psychosocial intervention for parents of children with cancer (34**). Web-based Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program (eSCCIP) was designed to alleviate anxiety and posttraumatic stress syndrome (PTSS) for caregivers. Video materials and interactive contents focused on four modules, including cognitive-behavioral skills, the story of other families undergoing similar situations, and activities to enhance mental wellness. As the study included the participatory design sessions with the limited number of participants, a further usability test with larger sample size will be needed for future investigation to confirm the initial positive findings.
Chaar et al. recently suggested smartphone-based mHealth interventions (Roadmap 2.0) to promote positive activities for family caregivers in the context of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) (35**). In this study, 24 caregivers of patients undergoing first-time HCT participated in home interviews. Caregivers shared effective stress relieving strategies, perceived benefits of simple positive psychological activities, such as Pleasant Activity Scheduling, Gratitude Journaling, Savoring, Random Acts of Kindness, Positive Piggy Bank, and Signature Strengths, that could be applied to the mobile app. The study results highlighted caregivers’ strong desire for engaging in positive activities to reduce stress and enhance their mental and physical well-being. Roadmap 2.0 is currently being developed and will be tested in a randomized controlled trial in family caregivers of HCT patients.
Social Support: Ventilating Feelings and Acquiring Coping Strategies
As smartphone and social media use are permeating individuals’ lives, online peer support groups have become useful resources for exchanging ideas among people who undergo similar situations. In many chronic conditions, caregivers take advantage of exchanging useful health information and share experiences with other peers (37,38). Such opportunities to interact with individuals in similar circumstances enables caregivers to gain from indirect experiences and obtain useful resources, resulting in improved stress-coping strategies and resilience (36).
Wang et al. conducted a quasi-experimental pre and post-study in parents of patients with Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to understand the effectiveness of a smartphone-based intervention (Care Assistant) and social network services (WeChat) on caregiver status, including social support, anxiety, depression, care burden uncertainty in illness, quality of life, and etc. (39*). Eight different themes were embedded in the app (Personal Information, Treatment Tracking, Family Care, Financial and Social Assistance, Knowledge Center, Self- Assessment Questionnaires, Interactive Platform, and Reminders) and the social network site provided updated information and interaction with clinicians. 49 and 43 parents in intervention group and control group completed the study respectively. After the 3-month intervention, parents reported decreased anxiety, depression, uncertainty, and knowledge needs. Also, the knowledge of parents had significantly enhanced. However, in the observation group, care burden and knowledge were significantly increased, whereas uncertainty in illness significantly decreased over the course of three months.
Fallon et al. conducted an online survey with the members of the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Survivors Network (CSN) to understand their usage of the site (40*). The survey results showed that both patients and caregivers desire informational and emotional support from other similar situations in the cancer context. This result highlights the role of social support, especially in rare cancer populations. As users can access CSN for free, this online social networking site has potentially great benefit for users worldwide.
DISCUSSION
Formative or/and Summative Evaluation of Interventions
While caregiver support interventions developed in the past focused mainly on information delivery and needs of engaging caregivers in the conversation with providers, studies in the last three years have begun introducing other foci, including the effectiveness of positive activities and benefits of having social supports through social network services. However, the outcome measures of the studies we reviewed were largely formative and/or summative evaluations of interventions, which means that the actual effectiveness of the intervention was not yet tested in a rigorous manner (e.g., prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled design). As evaluation phases should be considered as important in the development of an intervention, studies should consider active adoption of interventions in the healthcare environment. Future studies would benefit from large-scale usability studies, along with design of rigorous implementation and dissemination strategies.
The Needs of New Modes of Interactions
Our review revealed that there was a limited mode of interaction implemented in the current healthcare system. The studies herein focused primarily on web-based interventions or smartphone-based technology. Given the current social media environment, there are rich opportunities through different social network services, or newer technologies, such as conversational agents and healthcare robots, that should be actively considered for further study. A recent systematic review conducted by Laranjo et al. indicated that conversational agents can be effective solutions in a number of different health contexts (41**). The article pointed out that conversational agents (e.g., Amazon Alexa, Google assistants, Siri) have potential for great benefit in healthcare by assisting providers and providing around-the-clock support for patients and caregivers in the home environment. Similarly, Wang and colleagues suggested positive consequences of having social robots in the context of dementia care (42). By conducting semi-structured interview and a simple collaborative task between a patient and the robot, the study suggested future possibilities of alleviating caregiver’s burden via robots. However, most of the recent studies were conducted in lab settings, rather than within the actual environment where caregiver supporting tools are intended for use. New assistive technologies still need further investigations to be implemented in patient and caregiver’s home settings.
CONCLUSION
Online interventions provide rich opportunities for improving resilience and effective stress management skills in the context of chronic medical conditions, including among caregivers of cancer patients. By adopting interventions through smartphone or laptop platforms, caregivers have the potential to access useful information, perform simple and easy stress relieving activities, and engage in conversations with peers who undergo similar circumstances. Multidisciplinary collaboration and incorporation of usability testing in the design of these technology-mediated interventions are critical in the evaluation of newer technology. Future studies should explore whether new technologies that seamlessly and naturally integrate into caregivers’ lives may be novel strategies to support cancer caregivers.
KEY POINTS.
The majority of family caregivers of cancer patients are inadequately equipped with skills and information to provide care for their patients, resulting in caregiver distress.
Online interventions enable caregivers to access useful resources, such as health information, peer support groups, and guidance for simple stress relieving activities using personal devices.
Although the field involves ongoing discussions about the benefits of technology in supporting caregiving practices and ways to effectively disseminate them in the current healthcare environment, a limited number of evidence-based interventions are available in long-term follow-up cancer care or in survivorship settings.
Previous interventions that provide informational support, guidance for positive activities and opportunities for social support are heavily focused on formative and/or summative evaluations of interventions.
As recent technologies (e.g., conversational agents) increasingly show benefit in the healthcare environment, it remains important to investigate characteristics of such interactive technologies for supporting caregivers in home settings as well.
Financial support and sponsorship
Sung Won Choi is supported by an NIH/NHBLI grant (1R01HL146354) and the Edith S. Briskin and Shirley K Schlafer Endowed Research Professorship.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
None
REFERENCES
* of special interest
** of outstanding interest
- 1.Nichols H What are the leading causes of death in the US? [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2019 Sep 30]. Available from: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/282929.php
- 2.National Alliance for Caregiving & AARP. Caregiving in the US Natl Alliance Caregiving AARP Public Policy Inst. 2015;(June):1–87. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaziunas E, Ackerman MS, Veinot TCE. Localizing chronic disease management: Information work and health translations. Proc Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013;50(1):1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shin JY, Kedroske J, Vue R, Roshun S, Chaar D, Churay T, et al. Design Considerations for Family- Centered Health Management : Preliminary Findings with Pediatric BMT Patients. 2018;593–8. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sklenarova H, Krümpelmann A, Haun MW, Friederich H, Huber J, Thomas M, et al. When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer. 2015;121(9):1513–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L, Litzelman K, Chou WYS, Shelburne N, et al. Caring for caregivers and patients: Research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer. 2016;122(13):1987–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shaffer KM, Garland SN, Mao JJ, Applebaum AJ. Insomnia among cancer caregivers: A proposal for tailored cognitive behavioral therapy. J Psychother Integr. 2018;28(3):275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim Y, Carver CS, Shaffer KM, Gansler T, Cannady RS. Cancer caregiving predicts physical impairments: Roles of earlier caregiving stress and being a spousal caregiver. Cancer. 2015;121(2):302–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nissim R, Hales S, Zimmermann C, Deckert A, Edwards B, Rodin G. Supporting family caregivers of advanced cancer patients: a focus group study. Fam Relat. 2017;66(5):867–79. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hales S, Chiu A, Husain A, Braun M, Rydall A, Gagliese L, et al. The quality of dying and death in cancer and its relationship to palliative care and place of death. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;48(5):839–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.*.Sun V, Raz DJ, Kim JY. Caring for the informal cancer caregiver. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2019;13(3):238–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This review highlights need for more research that characteristics caregivers at high risk for burden, despite the significant evidence base on informal cancer caregiving.
- 12.Majestic C, Eddington KM. The impact of goal adjustment and caregiver burden on psychological distress among caregivers of cancer patients. Psycho‐Oncology. 2019; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wadhwa D, Burman D, Swami N, Rodin G, Lo C, Zimmermann C. Quality of life and mental health in caregivers of outpatients with advanced cancer. Psycho‐Oncology. 2013;22(2):403–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen Q, Terhorst L, Lowery-Allison A, Cheng H, Tsung A, Layshock M, et al. Sleep problems in advanced cancer patients and their caregivers: Who is disturbing whom? J Behav Med. 2019;1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ugalde A, Gaskin CJ, Rankin NM, Schofield P, Boltong A, Aranda S, et al. A systematic review of cancer caregiver interventions: Appraising the potential for implementation of evidence into practice. Psychooncology. 2019;28(4):687–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.**.Shin JY, Kang TI, Noll RB, Choi SW. Supporting caregivers of patients with cancer: a summary of technology-mediated interventions and future directions. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ B. 2018;38:838–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This review highlights 18 recent manuscript on the use of health technology mediated interventions that have been used to support cancer caregivers.
- 17.Kleine AK, Hallensleben N, Mehnert A, Hönig K, Ernst J. Psychological interventions targeting partners of cancer patients: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;140(May):52–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Prochaska JJ, Coughlin SS, Lyons EJ. Social Media and Mobile Technology for Cancer Prevention and Treatment. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ B. 2017;37:128–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Statista . Smartphone user penetration as percentage of total global population from 2014 to 2021.
- 20.Lapid MI, Atherton PJ, Clark MM, Kung S, Sloan JA, Rummans TA. Cancer Caregiver: Perceived Benefits of Technology. Telemed e-Health. 2015;21(11):893–902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.**.Marzorati C, Renzi C, Russell-Edu SW, Pravettoni G. Telemedicine use among caregivers of cancer patients: Systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This review of 24 studies suggest that there were improvements in some of the areas investigated, but they were often associated with small effect size, highlighting the need for more telemedicine tools for informal caregivers.
- 22.**.Ploeg J, Ali MU, Markle-Reid M, Valaitis R, Bartholomew A, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, et al. Caregiver-focused, web-based interventions: Systematic review and meta-analysis (Part 2). J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(10):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This review showed positive effects of web-based interventions on self-efficacy, self-esteem, and strain of caregivers of patients with chronic conditions.
- 23.Shapiro SL, Brown KW, Biegel GM. Teaching self-care to caregivers: Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on the mental health of therapists in training. Train Educ Prof Psychol. 2007;1(2):105. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Runaas L, Hanauer D, Maher M, Bischoff E, Fauer A, Hoang T, et al. BMT Roadmap: A User-Centered Design Health Information Technology Tool to Promote Patient-Centered Care in Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(5):813–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.*.Blackstone E, Lipson AR, Douglas SL. Closer: A videoconference intervention for distance caregivers of cancer patients. Res Nurs Health. 2019;42(4):256–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This is an ongoing randomized controlled trial of videoconference technology in 32 outpatient ambulatory clinics at a large comprehensive cancer center.
- 26.**.Slater PJ, Fielden PE, Bradford NK. The Oncology Family App: Providing Information and Support for Families Caring for Their Child With Cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2018;35(2):94–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The Oncology Family App (Queensland, Australia) was developed to support failies caring for kids with cancer. The App was efficient and convenient to use. Families provided positive feedback about the app to direct future development.
- 27.Kinnane NA, Milne DJ. The role of the Internet in supporting and informing carers of people with cancer: A literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(9):1123–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Senneseth M, Dyregrov A, Matthiesen SB, Pereira M, Hauken MA. Improving social network support for partners facing spousal cancer while caring for minors: Four-month outcomes of a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28(1):1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kaziunas E, Hanauer DA, Ackerman MS, Choi SW. Identifying unmet informational needs in the inpatient setting to increase patient and caregiver engagement in the context of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. 2015;1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.*.Struthers-Montford K, Psych R, Katia Tonkin M. Feasibility study of an online intervention to support male spouses of women with breast cancer. In: Oncology nursing forum. Oncology Nursing Society; 2017. p. 765–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The Male Transition Toolkit, a web-based psychosocial support intervention, was feasible, acceptable, and easy to use. More research is needed to determine its efficacy in improving spouse quality of life.
- 31.Sin NL, Lyubomirsky S. Enhancing well‐being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice‐friendly meta‐analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65(5):467–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bolier L, Haverman M, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E. Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.**.Kubo A, Kurtovich E, McGinnis MA, Aghaee S, Altschuler A, Quesenberry C, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of mHealth Mindfulness Intervention for Cancer Patients and Informal Cancer Caregivers: A Feasibility Study Within an Integrated Health Care Delivery System. Integr Cancer Ther. 2019;18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; An mHealth mindfulness intervention for cancer caregivers and patients was feasible with improved mindfulness reported by caregivers of the intervention group and improved quality of life among patients of the intervention group.
- 34.**.Canter KS, Deatrick JA, Hilgart MM, Myers J, Vega G, Ritterband LM, et al. eSCCIP: A psychosocial eHealth intervention for parents of children with cancer. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2019;7(1):44–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program may be an acceptable, feasible, and usable intervention for parents of children with cancer.
- 35.**.Chaar D, Shin JY, Mazzoli A, Vue R, Kedroske J, Chappell G, et al. Family Caregivers’ Perspectives on Care for Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Qualitative Study of Design Considerations for Roadmap 2.0. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Positive activity interventions delivered by mobile health technology may be acceptable by caregivers of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
- 36.Horton TV, Wallander JL. Hope and social support as resilience factors against psychological distress of mothers who care for children with chronic physical conditions. Rehabil Psychol. 2001;46(4):382. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gavrila V, Garrity A, Hirschfeld E, Edwards B, Lee JM. Peer support through a diabetes social media community. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019;13(3):493–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stewart M, Barnfather A, Neufeld A, Warren S, Letourneau N, Liu L. Accessible support for family caregivers of seniors with chronic conditions: from isolation to inclusion. Can J Aging/La Rev Can du Vieil. 2006;25(2):179–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.*.Wang J, Howell D, Shen N, Geng Z, Wu F, Shen M, et al. Mhealth supportive care intervention for parents of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Quasi-experimental pre- and postdesign study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2018;6(11). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A mobile health app for caregivers of children with ALL (Care Assistant) was associated with reduced pre-post caregiver anxiety and uncertainty in illness and with improved social function and knowledge of ALL and care.
- 40.*.Fallon EA, Driscoll D, Smith TS, Richardson K, Portier K. Description, characterization, and evaluation of an online social networking community: the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Survivors Network®. J Cancer Surviv. 2018;12(5):691–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This manuscript describes an online social networking community - the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Survivors Network (CSN; csn.cancer.org).
- 41.Laranjo L, Dunn AG, Tong HL, Kocaballi AB, Chen J, Bashir R, et al. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2018;25(9):1248–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang RH, Sudhama A, Begum M, Huq R, Mihailidis A. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. Int psychogeriatrics. 2017;29(1):67–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]