Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Med Inform. 2017 Oct 23;114:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.014

Table 4.

Effect of the template use on clinical documentation.

Documentation scores, with vs. without RST use (post-intervention only)

Condition n Comparison # Criteria Difference Lower Upper p Value
Hypertension 30 Scoring criteria 14 47% 42% 53%  < 0.001
Control criteria 6 2% −5% 8% 0.62
Diabetes 14 Scoring criteria 15 43% 33% 53%  < 0.001
Control criteria 7 −1% −5% 3% 0.59
Chronic Respiratory Diseases 11 Scoring criteria 17/18 27% 21% 34%  < 0.001
Control criteria 6 −7% −14% 1% 0.07

Differences in clinical documentation between encounters where RSTs were used and where they were not. Differences were calculated only in patient charts (n) where post-intervention encounters included at least one encounter where a RST was used and one where it was not. A paired t-test was conducted by taking the differences in scores for each patient between the pre- and post-intervention periods for both ‘Scoring’ and ‘Control’ criteria. The average difference across patients, and the lower and upper limits of the confidence intervals are reported, along with corresponding p-values.