Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 11;9(3):1115–1130. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2764

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Morphological and metastatic characteristics of parental and gemcitabine (GEM)‐resistant cell lines. A, Morphological characteristics of parental and GEM‐resistant cells were determined using an inverted microscope. Red arrows indicate cellular pseudopods. B and C, Transwell assays showed increased migratory and invasive abilities among BxPC‐3‐GR cells compared with BxPC‐3 cells. D and E, Comparisons of migration and invasion between CFPAC‐1 and CFPAC‐1‐GR cells using transwell assays detected no significant differences. ***P < .001; comparisons indicated by lines. NS, no significant difference. Scale bar, 100 µm