Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 3;5:4. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-0208-x

Table 2.

Mean d’ for intact images used in the testing sessions

Experiment and training schedule Testing image Pre-test Post-test 1 Post-test 2 Post-test 3 Final test Pre-test vs. final test

1A (N = 12)

30-image

Trained −0.04 0.67 0.64 0.95 1.58 P < .001
Untrained −0.10 0.40 0.22 0.68 0.88 P < .002

1B (N = 12)

60-image

Trained 0.30 0.76 0.96 0.86 0.88 P < .001
Untrained −0.03 0.47 0.88 0.48 1.01 P < .007

2 (N = 12)

60-image

Trained 0.18 0.94 0.49 1.01 0.68 P = .16a
Untrained −0.15 0.80 0.54 0.70 0.66 P < .005

3 (N = 24)

30-image

Trained −0.11 Not applicable 1.14 P < .001
Untrained 0.08 Not applicable 0.74 P < .001

P values show results from t tests comparing pre-test with the final post-test

aIn experiment 2, although the pre-test did not differ significantly from the final post-test, it was significantly worse than the average of all four post-tests, p < .05