Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 9;23(2):100827. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.100827

Figure 1.

Figure 1

STEM Imaging and Tomography Revealed Distinct Bacterial Phenotype Distribution in PAO1 and PAO1ΔwspF Biofilms

(A) STEM images of the in vitro PAO1 biofilm and PAO1ΔwspF biofilm showed a distinct spatial distribution of two bacterial phenotypes named as bacteriawhite and bacteriagray. Unlike that in PAO1 biofilm where the bacteriawhite and bacteriagray were homogenously distributed throughout the biofilm, bacteriawhite and bacteriagray are segregated in the PAO1ΔwspF biofilm. Bacteriawhite was observed from lower-middle to apical area, and bacteriagray was observed from basal to lower-middle area. The pseudo-colored rendering derived from 3D STEM tomographic structure of the PAO1 biofilm and PAO1ΔwspF biofilm. Scale bar, 1 μm.

(B) STEM images showed the successful separation of bacteriawhite and bacteriagray in PAO1 biofilm and PAO1ΔwspF biofilm. The baclight fraction and bacheavy fraction were obtained from the density gradient centrifugation of biofilm following DNaseI treatment. Scale bar, 1 μm.

(C) Real-time changes in oxygen consumption rate (OCR, in picomoles of molecular oxygen per minute) measured on a Seahorse XFe Extracellular Flux Analyzer in baclight fraction and bacheavy fraction of PAO1 and PAO1ΔwspF biofilm. (n = 10). Data are mean ± SD.

(D) Live dead staining of PAO1 and PAO1ΔwspF biofilm using SYTO Green and PI at 48 h. Scale bar, 20 μm.

See also Figures S1 and S2.