Table 4.
PPDS groupsa | ORs for inadequate GWG in IBD compared to non-IBD with low intake of PPDS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N (obs) | 1 | 2 | 3 | aOR (95% CI) low compared to high PDDS | aOR (95%) middle compared to high PPDS | |
Inadequate GWG (%) | ||||||
Non-IBD | 68,680 | 6923 (20.3) | 3221 (18.4) | 3067 (18) | ||
IBD | 341 | 68 (30.8) | 22 (31.4) | 14 (28) | 2.35 (1.23, 4.49) | 1.38 (0.64, 2.99) |
CD | 148 | 31 (32.6) | 17 (48.6) | 4 (18) | 4.22 (1.28, 13.92) | 4.09 (1.13, 14.29) |
UC | 193 | 37 (29.4) | 5 (14.3) | 10 (31.1) | 1.65 (0.76, 3.59) | 0.45 (0.14, 1.51) |
OR adjusted for mothers’ education and age, aGroup 1 = quartile 1 + 2, group 2 = quartile 3, group 3 = quartile 4, highest PPDS group (group 3) was used as reference group, GWG gestational weight gain, PPDS proportion of protein from dairy sources
Plural birth and extreme energy intake and 50 kg < GWG < −30 kg excluded