Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 16;24(1):78–89. doi: 10.1017/S204579601300067X

Table 1.

Study design

Year of data Location Treatment sites Patient episodes Patients Costs included Measurement of staff time Valuation of resource use
GROUP A
1 Cromwell et al. 2001–2003 USA 40 834 Medicare Direct care staff, ancillary indirect/overhead Self-reported logs, direct observation, 7 days CMI multiplied with average costs
2 Gaines et al. 2003 New Zealand 8 2848 No restriction medical/health staff, ancillary, indirect/overhead Self-reported summaries (nurses), 6 month Top-down allocation
3 Hirdes et al. 1999–2000 Canada 34 1998 No restriction Clinical staff excl. physicians Self-reported logs, 1 day/7 days Avg. wages
4 Buckingham et al. 1996 Australia 22 6554 No restriction Direct care staff, indirect/overhead Self-reported logs, 3 months Top-down allocation
5 Yamauchi 1993 Japan 17 2284 No restriction Physicians, nurses, therapists Self-reported logs, 1 day/7 days Avg. wages
6 Fries et al. Unclear USA 51 890 Long-staying Nurses, physicians, psychologists, other therapists Self-reported logs, 1 day/7 days Avg. wages
GROUP B
7 Iglesias & Alonso Villa 2003 Spain 1 163 Long-staying Nurses, aides Self-reported logs, 7 days None
8 Autio Unclear USA 1 42 No restriction Nurses, counselors Obs. patient sampling, rand. 10 min interval, ten shifts None

Ancillary = e.g. radiology, pharmacy, pathology; CMI = case-mix index; obs.: = observational; rand. = randomised.