Table 3.

Linear regression analysis of correlates of RG-UK^*

	Model 1			Model 2			Model 3			Model 4
Variable	β	s.e.	P	β	s.e.	p	β	s.e.	p	β	s.e.	p
Age	−0.06	0.02	<0.001	−0.05	0.02	0.007	−0.07	0.02	<0.001	−0.07	0.02	<0.001
Employed	2.34	0.45	<0.001	2.07	0.45	<0.001	1.48	0.44	0.001	1.35	0.44	0.003
Female gender	1.19	0.37	0.001	1.09	0.37	0.004	1.26	0.36	<0.001	1.27	0.36	<0.001
University graduate	0.77	0.40	0.058	0.77	0.40	0.054	0.79	0.39	0.040	0.83	0.39	0.032
Not involuntary patient				1.05	0.41	0.010	0.91	0.39	0.021	0.96	0.39	0.015
Length of contact with MH services				−0.04	0.02	0.051	−0.02	0.02	0.338	−0.02	0.02	0.318
Diagnosis				−0.27	0.22	0.216	−0.272	0.21	0.198	−0.24	0.21	0.264
Experienced discrimination							−0.06	0.01	<0.001	−0.06	0.01	<0.001
Chose not to start work										−0.32	0.39	0.410
Chose not to start education										−0.07	0.43	0.863
Chose not to start a relationship										−0.77	0.38	0.046
Concealed diagnosis										0.12	0.42	0.783
Constant	15.83	1.36	<0.001	14.31	1.64	<0.001	15.61	1.58	<0.001	15.63	1.59	<0.001
Model summary	Radj2 = 0. 24 F = 50.83,			Radj2 = 0. 26, F = 34.48,			Radj2 = 0.31 F = 40.53,			Radj2 = 0.31, F = 28.54,
	p < 0.001			p < 0.001			p < 0.001			p < 0.001

^*Adjusted for human capital.