Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 3;22:11. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-0602-z

Table 3.

Intraclass correlation coefficients for each measured variable between each of the 3 CMR readers. Values greater than 0.9 reflect excellent agreement. Inter-rater agreement is very strong

Outcome Rater Pair Intraclass Correlation Results
Average ICC 95% Conf. Interval
LVEDV LO-RC 0.993 (0.973, 0.998)
LO-YL 0.994 (0.966, 0.999)
RC-YL 0.994 (0.965, 0.999)
LVESV LO-RC 0.984 (0.935, 0.996)
LO-YL 0.999 (0.993, 0.999)
RC-YL 0.993 (0.960, 0.999)
LVSV LO-RC 0.985 (0.941, 0.996)
LO-YL 0.986 (0.921, 0.998)
RC-YL 0.979 (0.880, 0.996)
LV Mass LO-RC 0.945 (0.779, 0.986)
LO-YL 0.944 (0.673, 0.990)
RC-YL 0.984 (0.906, 0.997)
RVEDV LO-RC 0.990 (0.960, 0.998)
LO-YL 0.994 (0.965, 0.999)
RC-YL 0.989 (0.938, 0.998)
RVESV LO-RC 0.974 (0.896, 0.994)
LO-YL 0.983 (0.898, 0.997)
RC-YL 0.964 (0.790, 0.994)
RVSV LO-RC 0.982 (0.929, 0.996)
LO-YL 0.995 (0.969, 0.999)
RC-YL 0.994 (0.965, 0.999)

LVEDV left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LVESV left ventricular end-systolic volume, LVSV left ventricular stroke volume, RVEDV right ventricular end-diastolic volume, RVESV right ventricular end-systolic volume, RVSV right ventricular stroke volume