Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cancer Cell International logoLink to Cancer Cell International
. 2020 Feb 3;20:39. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-1125-2

The prognostic value of De Ritis (AST/ALT) ratio in patients after surgery for urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xu Hu 1,#, Wei-Xiao Yang 1,#, Yan Wang 1,#, Yan-Xiang Shao 1, San-Chao Xiong 1, Xiang Li 2,✉
PMCID: PMC6998332  PMID: 32042266

Abstract

Background

Recently, the De Ritis (AST/ALT) ratio has been considered as a prognostic biomarker for various malignancies. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of preoperative De Ritis ratio in patients after surgery for urothelial carcinoma.

Methods

We searched the online database Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library up to October 2019. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted from the studies.

Results

A total of 8 studies incorporating 3949 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. We observed that elevated preoperative De Ritis ratio is associated with inferior OS (HR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.70–2.28; P < 0.001), CSS (HR = 2.40; 95% CI 2.02–2.86; P < 0.001), RFS (HR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.11–1.54; P = 0.001), PFS (HR = 2.07; 95% CI 1.68–2.56; P < 0.001) and MFS (HR = 2.39; 95% CI 1.16–4.91; P = 0.018). Stratified by diseases, the elevated De Ritis ratio also served as an unfavorable factor.

Conclusion

The elevated preoperative De Ritis ratio is an unfavorable factor for patients with urothelial carcinoma. In patients with BC and UTUC, the elevated preoperative De Ritis ratio is also associated with poor prognosis. But De Ritis ratio must be validated in large, independent cohorts before it can be applied widely.

Keywords: De Ritis ratio, Urothelial carcinoma, Surgery, Prognosis, Meta-analysis

Background

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies, with an estimated 80 thousand new cases and 18 thousand deaths in the United States in 2019 [1]. UC is mainly composed of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder cancer (BC), which are situated at the upper and lower urinary tract, respectively [2]. UTUC is a rare disease that accounts for approximately 5–10% UC, while BC takes up 90–95% of UC and is the most common urinary tract malignancy [3, 4]. Although radical nephroureterectomy (RUN) with bladder cuff excision is the standard treatment for patients with non-metastatic UTUC, high incidences of postoperative disease recurrence have been reported [2, 5]. Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard approach in patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), while the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate after RC is approximately 60% [4, 6, 7].

Thus, it is important to precisely predict clinical course after surgery during counseling to determine the suitable treatment and follow-up strategies for individual patients with UC. Pathological T stage and tumor grade are established prognostic factors, besides several prognostic favors are also presented, including lymphovascular invasion, tumor necrosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), systemic inflammation and others [2, 4, 6–8].

Aminotransaminases, including aspartate aminotransaminase (AST) and alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), are enzymes released from the liver cell into the blood stream, reflecting hepatocellular damage [9]. The ratio of the serum activities of AST to ALT, firstly described by De Ritis and known as the De Ritis ratio [10]. The De Ritis ratio has been used as a predictor of several chronic liver diseases [11]. Recently, this ratio has been considered as a prognostic biomarker for various malignancies, such as renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer [12–14]. While in patients with surgically treated UC, the prognostic value of De Ritis ratio is still unclear. Nishikawa et al. found that elevated De Ritis ratio is associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with UC, while the other study did not detect the significant association between elevated De Ritis ratio and RFS [15, 16]. As a result, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of preoperative De Ritis ratio in patients after surgery for UC.

Method

Literature search strategy

Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library up to October 2019. We applied the following items: urothelial carcinoma (urothelial, bladder, tumor, cancer or carcinoma) and De Ritis ratio (aspartate aminotransferase, AST, alanine aminotransferase, ALT, AST/ALT ratio, AST to ALT ratio) as keywords or Mesh. We also screened the reference lists of all eligible studies to ensure comprehensive search. Two reviewers screened the literature independently, any disagreements were resolved by discussing or consulting another one.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

We included articles conforming to the following inclusion criteria: (1) random-controlled studies or observational studies; (2) patients were diagnosed urothelial carcinoma and underwent surgery; (3) De Ritis ratio was obtained before surgery; (4) evaluated the prognostic value of preoperative De Ritis ratio, (5) reported available data for analyses, for example: overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) or metastasis-free survival (MFS). The following studies were excluded: (1) non-English language; (2) patients did not undergo surgery; (3) did not involve the De Ritis ratio, (4) no available data for analyses. We did not include conference abstracts owing to incomplete information. Regarding duplicated records, we only included the most recent and informative study.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Two reviewers extracted items from all eligible studies independently, which are as follows: the name of the first author and published year, enrollment data and location, study type, diseases, intervention, number of patients, age, the cutoff value of the De Ritis ratio, the duration of follow-up. Concerning the clinical outcome such as OS, CSS, RFS, and PFS, we extracted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) from the studies. If the HRs and 95% CI were not revealed, we could calculate the HR and 95% CI based on the method by Tierney [17]. We used the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of the observational studies. And studies with a score of no less than 7 were considered as good quality.

Statistical analysis

We conducted all statistical analyses by using STATA version 12 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). As for the clinical outcome, we pooled the HRs and 95% CI. And we used Q and I2 statistics to evaluate the heterogeneity among studies. A random-effect model was used when we observed the significant heterogeneity (P < 0.10 or I2 > 50%); otherwise, a fixed-effect model was used [18]. We also carried out subgroup analyses based on available data. In addition, we performed sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of the final results. In terms of the publication bias, we used Egger’s test and Begg’s test. A two-sided P-value < 0.05 was considered as a statistical difference.

Results

Study search

The study search strategy yield 304 studies, 5 of which were duplicated records. After screening titles and abstracts of the remaining 299 studies, 20 studies were reviewed comprehensively. Finally, a total of 8 studies incorporating 3949 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis [15, 16, 19–24]. The flow diagram of the study search and selection is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Flow chart of study selection

Characteristics of included studies

Of the enrolled 8 studies, all are published in recent 3 years and are retrospective. Five studies involved the patients with UTUC and underwent RUN [15, 16, 20], 3 studies involved patients with BC and treated by RC [19, 21, 22]. The median ages of patients were similar, ranging from 61 to 69. All studies defined the De Ritis ratio as a dichotomous variable, which was measured before surgery. Most studies had a relatively long follow-up, and median follow-up ranged from 33.3 months to 84 months, while one study did not report the duration of the follow-up [22]. Seven studies observed the OS and CSS, 3 studies revealed the clinical outcome of RFS and PFS, and only one study involves the MFS. Detailed characteristics of the included studies were shown in Table 1. All studies included in our meta-analysis were considered as high quality (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of enrolled studies

Study/published year Enrollment date/location Study type Tumor Treatment Number of patients Age (years) Cut off of AST/ALT Outcomes Follow-up (months) NOS
Yuk 2019 [19] 1991 and 2015/South Korea Retrospective Non-metastatic urothelial BC RC 771 Mean ± SD 64.8 ± 10.2 1.1 OS CSS RFS Median (IQR) 84 (36–275) 8
Li 2019 [20] March 1999 and January 2015/China Retrospective Localized UTUC RNU 885 Mean ± SD 66.98 ± 10.55 1.23 OS CSS PFS Median (IQR) 61.0(38–102) 8
Ha 2019 [21] August 2008 and May 2013/South Korea Retrospective Non-metastatic urothelial BC RC 118 Median (IQR) 69 (60–74) 1.3 OS CSS MFS Median 34.1 7
Nishikawa 2018 [15] 2005 and 2015/Japan Retrospective Localized UTUC RUN 135 Median (Range) 69 (52–86) 1.3 RFS Median 36.1 8
Gorgel 2017 [22] February 2006 and December 2016/Turkey Retrospective Non-metastatic urothelial BC RC 149 Mean (SD) 61.65 ± 9.13 1.3 OS CSS NA 7
Cho 2017 [24] 2004 and 2015/South Korea Retrospective Non-metastatic UTUC RUN 1049 Median (IQR) 68.5 (60.5–74.3) 1.6 OS CSS RFS Median (IQR) 40 (18.4–64.8) 7
Lee 2017[16] September 1994 and December 2013/South Korea Retrospective Non-metastatic UTUC RUN 583 Median (IQR) 65 (56–72) 1.5 OS CSS PFS Mean (IQR) 35.0 (16–66) 8
Gao 2017 [23] March 2005 and August 2015/China Retrospective Non-metastatic UTUC RUN 259 Mean (SD) 67.53 ± 10.43 1.3 OS CSS PFS Median (Range) 33.3 (15.5–64.2) 7
Open in a new tab

UTUC upper tract urothelial carcinoma, BC bladder cancer, RUN radical nephroureterectomy, RC radical cystectomy, IQR interquartile range, SD standard derivation, OS overall survival, CSS cancer-specific survival, PFS progression-free SURVIVAL, RFS recurrence-free survival, MFS metastasis-free survival, NA not available, NOS newcastle-ottawa quality assessment scale

Overall survival

Regarding 7 studies including 3814 patients, the pooled results demonstrated that elevated De Ritis ratio was significantly associated with worse OS, the pooled HR was 1.97 (95% CI 1.70–2.28; P < 0.001). We did not detect significant heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.563, Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

a The association between preoperative De Ritis ratio and OS in patients with UC. b The association between preoperative De Ritis ratio and CSS in patients with UC. c The association between preoperative De Ritis ratio and PFS in patients with UC. d The association between preoperative De Ritis ratio and RFS in patients with UC

Cancer-specific survival

As shown in Fig. 3, we demonstrated that the patients with elevated preoperative De Ritis ratio had an inferior CSS. The pooled HR was 2.40 (95% CI 2.02–2.86; P < 0.001). No evidence of heterogeneity was revealed (I2 = 23.7%, P = 0.248, Fig. 2b).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Sensitivity analyses for a OS. b CSS

Progression-free survival and recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival

In terms of 2 studies incorporating 1727 patients and 1955 patients, we found that the patients with a higher De Ritis ratio had a significantly increased risk of progression and recurrence compared with those with lower De Ritis ratio. The pooled HRs for PFS and RFS were 2.07 (95% CI 1.68–2.56; P < 0.001; Fig. 2c) and 1.31 (95% CI 1.11–1.54; P = 0.001; Fig. 2d), respectively. There was also no heterogeneity among studies. Only one study reported the MFS and higher De Ritis ratio was associated with an increased risk of metastasis (HR = 2.39; 95% CI 1.16–4.91; P = 0.018).

Publication bias and sensitivity analysis

Because of the small number of included studies, we only performed publication bias and sensitivity analysis for OS and CSS. We carried out sensitivity analyses by removing each study sequentially. After removing each study sequentially, we did not observe a relative change, which showed the stability of our results (Fig. 3). Regarding publication bias, we did not detect significant publication bias of OS and CSS according to the Begg’s test (OS: P = 0.230; CSS: P = 0.230) and Egger’s test (OS: P = 0.059; CSS: P = 0.106).

Subgroup analyses

Due to the small number of enrolled studies, we only performed subgroup analyses for OS and CSS and stratified by, the number of patients, cutoff value and diseases. For the studies that included ≤ 500 patients, the elevated De Ritis ratio was significant associated with worse OS (HR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.66–3.20; P < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 2.73; 95% CI 1.82–4.10; P < 0.001). And in the > 500 patients subgroup, higher De Ritis was also considered as an unfavorable factor for OS (HR = 1.90; 95% CI 1.61–2.23; P < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 2.34; 95% CI 1.93–2.83; P < 0.001). In cutoff value of ≤ 1.3 subgroup, the patients with elevated De Ritis ratio has a worse OS (HR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.57–2.26; P < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.84–2.88; P < 0.001). Similarly, in the cutoff value of > 1.3 subgroup, higher De Ritis ratio was associated with worse OS (HR = 2.13; 95% CI 1.67–2.71; P < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 2.57; 95% CI 1.95–3.39; P < 0.001). Furthermore, stratified by diseases, elevated De Ritis ratio could serve as an unfavorable factor for OS (HR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.73–2.51; P < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 2.59; 95% CI 2.08–3.21; P < 0.001) in the patients with UTUC. In addition, in the subgroup of BC, the elevated De Ritis ratio was significantly associated with inferior OS (HR = 1.80; 95% CI 1.43–2.27; P < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 2.71; 95% CI 1.38–5.31; P = 0.004). The detailed information was summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Subgroup analyses of OS and CSS

Outcome Variable Number of studies Model HR (95% CI) I2 (%) P value of heterogeneity
OS All 7 Fixed 1.97 (1.70–2.28) 0.0 0.563
No. of patients ≤ 500 3 Fixed 2.30 (1.66–3.20) 0.0 0.670
> 500 4 Fixed 1.90 (1.61–2.23) 0.0 0.396
Cutoff ≤ 1.3 5 Fixed 1.88 (1.57–2.26) 4.4 0.382
> 1.3 2 Fixed 2.13 (1.67–2.71) 0.0 0.850
Disease BC 3 Fixed 1.80 (1.43–2.27) 47.3 0.150
UTUC 4 Fixed 2.08 (1.73–2.51) 0.0 0.988
CSS All 4 Fixed 2.61 (2.06–3.31) 5.1 0.367
No. of patients ≤ 500 3 Fixed 2.73 (1.82–4.10) 35.9 0.210
> 500 4 Fixed 2.34 (1.93–2.83) 30.0 0.232
Cutoff ≤ 1.3 5 Fixed 2.30 (1.84–2.88) 46.5 0.113
> 1.3 2 Fixed 2.57 (1.95–3.39) 0.0 0.956
Disease BC 3 Random 2.71 (1.38–5.31) 65.2 0.056
UTUC 3 Fixed 2.59 (2.08–3.21) 0.0 0.839
Open in a new tab

OS overall survival, CSS cancer-specific survival, BC bladder cancer, UTUC upper tract urothelial carcinoma

– Not available

Discussion

Despite the development of surgical techniques and adjuvant therapies, the prognosis of patients with UC did not improve a lot. Several prognostic factors were proposed in recent years, including lymphovascular invasion, tumor necrosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), systemic inflammation and others [2, 4, 6–8].

In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of De Ritis ratio in patients with surgically treated UC. We demonstrated that a higher preoperative De Ritis ratio is associated with inferior OS, CSS, PFS, and RFS. When stratified by diseases, the elevated preoperative De Ritis ratio was also an unfavorable factor in patients with either BC or UTUC. Regarding the difference of cutoff values, we divided studies into ≤ 1.3 and > 1.3 groups and found that elevated De Ritis ratio is correlated to poor OS and CSS. In addition, we conducted sensitivity analyses and did not observe a relatively big change. There was also no evidence for publication bias, reflecting the robustness of our results.

So far, several studies have shown the prognostic value of aminotransaminases in patients with malignancies irrespective of the presence of liver-specific disease [12–14, 25, 26]. For example, Stocken et al. found that AST was associated with overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer [13]. Generally, AST is widely expressed in various tissues such as the brain, muscle, kidney, but ALT is regarded as more liver-specific or enriched [11]. Pathological processes were shown to bring about tissue damage and higher proliferative status, and high tumor cell turnover tends to increase AST rather than ALT, making the De Ritis ratio an attractive potential biomarker [27].

De Ritis ratio, the ratio of the serum activities of AST to ALT, was firstly described by De Ritis [10]. The De Ritis ratio was mostly used as a predictor of several chronic liver diseases in previous studies [11]. Currently, several studies have demonstrated that the De Ritis ratio could serve as a prognostic factor in patients with several cancers. For instance, Bezan et al. enrolled 698 patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma and found that increased (≥ 1.26) preoperative AST/ALT ratio was an independent prognostic factor for metastasis-free survival (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.25–2.07, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34–2.32, P < 0.001). Furthermore, Lee et al. revealed that elevated AST/ALT ratio was an unfavorable factor for OS, CSS, and PFS in patients surgically treated for localized clear-cell RCC [28]. We summarized all available studies and also found that elevated De Ritis ratio is associated with poor prognosis in patients after surgery for urothelial carcinoma.

The association between the De Ritis ratio and histological tumor necrosis, pathological T stage strength this finding. Currently, tumor metabolism has gained attention concerning the carcinogenesis of malignancies. The Warburg effect is the well-known cancer metabolism, describing the abnormal anaerobic glycolysis in cancer cells for producing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) regardless of the availability of the oxygen [29]. Increased glycolysis is shown to be associated with mitochondrial dysfunction linked to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-related enzymes and glucose transporters [30]. Furthermore, AST is a component of a malate-aspartate shuttle pathway that allows NADH/NAD+ conversion [31]. Therefore, the De Ritis ratio might be related to tumor metabolism in many glucose-using cancers. Reportedly, urothelial carcinoma was associated with glucose metabolism [32]. Whyard et al. researched the uptake of fluorescent glucose by bladder cancer cells using fluorescence microscopy and observed significant differences in glucose consumption between normal urothelium and malignant urothelial cells [33]. Based on these findings and our study, it is highly likely that the De Ritis ratio is associated with the prognosis of patients with urothelial carcinoma. But the detailed interaction between the De Ritis ratio and poor prognosis of patients with urothelial carcinoma remains to be explored.

The De Ritis ratio has important implications for clinical practice. The patients with a higher De Ritis ratio had an inferior survival. It may serve as a potential selection criterion for risk factor stratified management of urothelial carcinoma and adjuvant therapies. Besides, close postoperative follow-up should be emphasized for these patients. The AST/ALT ratio is easily accessible and relatively inexpensive because AST and ALT are the most commonly used serum biomarkers in our daily clinical practice.

Despite our novel findings, the present study has some limitations. Firstly, a total of 8 studies incorporating 3949 patients was included in the quantitative synthesis, which is a relatively small number and may limit the power of the final results. So more studies are needed to validate our findings. Secondly, all studies are retrospective, which may increase the risk of bias because of the retrospective data analysis. Thirdly, although included studies tried to exclude all patients with acute or chronic liver disease, they may not eliminate the undetected diseases that confounded results. As results, the De Ritis ratio must be validated in large, independent cohorts before it can be applied widely.

Conclusion

The preoperative De Ritis ratio is an unfavorable factor for patients with urothelial carcinoma. When stratified by diseases, in patients with BC and UTUC, the De Ritis ratio is also associated with poor prognosis. However, the De Ritis ratio must be validated in large, independent cohorts before it can be applied widely.

Acknowledgements

None.

Abbreviations

UTUC

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma

BC

Bladder cancer

RUN

Radical nephroureterectomy

RC

Radical cystectomy

OS

Overall survival

CSS

Cancer-specific survival

PFS

Progression-free survival

RFS

Recurrence-free survival

MFS

Metastasis-free survival

NOS

Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale

HR

Hazard ratio

CI

Confidence interval

MIBC

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer

NMIBC

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

ECOG-PS

Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status

AST

Aspartate aminotransaminase

ALT

Alanine aminotransaminase

Authors’ contributions

Conception and design: XL and XH; Collection and assembly of data: XH, YW, and W-XY; Data analysis and interpretation: XL, XH and S-CX; Manuscript writing: All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

All the data (pooled HR with 95% CI of OS, CSS, PFS, RFS, and MFS) used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Xu Hu, Wei-Xiao Yang and Yan Wang authors contributed equally to this article

References

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roupret M, Babjuk M, Comperat E, Zigeuner R, Sylvester RJ, Burger M, Cowan NC, Bohle A, Van Rhijn BW, Kaasinen E, et al. European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma: 2015 update. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):868–879. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Raman JD, Messer J, Sielatycki JA, Hollenbeak CS. Incidence and survival of patients with carcinoma of the ureter and renal pelvis in the USA, 1973–2005. BJU Int. 2011;107(7):1059–1064. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09675.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Comperat EM, Hernandez V, Kaasinen E, Palou J, Roupret M, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016. Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):447–461. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF, Kamat AM, Zigeuner R, Kikuchi E, Lotan Y, Weizer A, Raman JD, Wood CG. Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the upper tract urothelial carcinoma collaboration. Cancer. 2009;115(6):1224–1233. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Comperat EM, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Bruins HM, Hernandez V, Espinos EL, Dunn J, Rouanne M, et al. Updated 2016 EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):462–475. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S, Skinner E, Bochner B, Thangathurai D, Mikhail M, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(3):666–675. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lughezzani G, Burger M, Margulis V, Matin SF, Novara G, Roupret M, Shariat SF, Wood CG, Zigeuner R. Prognostic factors in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: a comprehensive review of the current literature. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):100–114. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ozer J, Ratner M, Shaw M, Bailey W, Schomaker S. The current state of serum biomarkers of hepatotoxicity. Toxicology. 2008;245(3):194–205. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.De Ritis F, Coltorti M, Giusti G. An enzymic test for the diagnosis of viral hepatitis; the transaminase serum activities. Clin Chimi Acta. 1957;2(1):70–74. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(57)90027-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Botros M, Sikaris KA. The De Ritis ratio: the test of time. Clin Biochem Rev. 2013;34(3):117–130. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bezan A, Mrsic E, Krieger D, Stojakovic T, Pummer K, Zigeuner R, Hutterer GC, Pichler M. The preoperative AST/ALT (De Ritis) ratio represents a poor prognostic factor in a cohort of patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2015;194(1):30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stocken DD, Hassan AB, Altman DG, Billingham LJ, Bramhall SR, Johnson PJ, Freemantle N. Modelling prognostic factors in advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(6):883–893. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thornburg JM, Nelson KK, Clem BF, Lane AN, Arumugam S, Simmons A, Eaton JW, Telang S, Chesney J. Targeting aspartate aminotransferase in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(5):R84. doi: 10.1186/bcr2154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nishikawa M, Miyake H, Kurahashi T, Fujisawa M. Significance of multiple preoperative laboratory abnormalities as prognostic indicators in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract following radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23(1):151–157. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1184-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee H, Choi YH, Sung HH, Han DH, Jeon HG, Chang Jeong B, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Choi HY. De Ritis Ratio (AST/ALT) as a significant prognostic factor in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer treated with surgery. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15(3):e379–e385. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:16. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yuk HD, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH, Ku JH. De Ritis Ratio (aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase) as a significant prognostic factor in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with bladder urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study. Dis Markers. 2019;2019:6702964. doi: 10.1155/2019/6702964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li Y, Fang D, Bao Z, He A, Guan B, He S, Zhan Y, Gong Y, Li X, Zhou L. High aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase ratio predicts poor prognosis in patients with localized upper tract urothelial cancer: a propensity score-matched study in a large Chinese center. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:2635–2648. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S193771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ha YS, Kim SW, Chun SY, Chung JW, Choi SH, Lee JN, Kim BS, Kim HT, Yoo ES, Kwon TG, et al. Association between De Ritis ratio (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase) and oncological outcomes in bladder cancer patients after radical cystectomy. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0439-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gorgel SN, Kose O, Koc EM, Ates E, Akin Y, Yilmaz Y. The prognostic significance of preoperatively assessed AST/ALT (De Ritis) ratio on survival in patients underwent radical cystectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017;49(9):1577–1583. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1648-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gao X, Chen W, Zhang R, Wu C, Li Y, Zhu H, Deng Z, Yu Z, Wu S, Pan Y. Preoperative AST/ALT ratio predicts long-term survival after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017;10(5):8464–8471. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cho YH, Hwang JE, Chung HS, Kim MS, Hwang EC, Jung SI, Kang TW, Kwon DD, Choi SH, Kim HT, et al. The De Ritis (aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase) ratio as a predictor of oncological outcomes in patients after surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017;49(8):1383–1390. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1613-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tan X, Xiao K, Liu W, Chang S, Zhang T, Tang H. Prognostic factors of distal cholangiocarcinoma after curative surgery: a series of 84 cases. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013;60(128):1892–1895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Takenaka Y, Takemoto N, Yasui T, Yamamoto Y, Uno A, Miyabe H, Ashida N, Shimizu K, Nakahara S, Hanamoto A, et al. Transaminase activity predicts survival in patients with head and neck cancer. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Conde VR, Oliveira PF, Nunes AR, Rocha CS, Ramalhosa E, Pereira JA, Alves MG, Silva BM. The progression from a lower to a higher invasive stage of bladder cancer is associated with severe alterations in glucose and pyruvate metabolism. Exp Cell Res. 2015;335(1):91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee H, Lee SE, Byun SS, Kim HH, Kwak C, Hong SK. De Ritis ratio (aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase ratio) as a significant prognostic factor after surgical treatment in patients with clear-cell localized renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study. BJU Int. 2017;119(2):261–267. doi: 10.1111/bju.13545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324(5930):1029–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dorward A, Sweet S, Moorehead R, Singh G. Mitochondrial contributions to cancer cell physiology: redox balance, cell cycle, and drug resistance. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1997;29(4):385–392. doi: 10.1023/A:1022454932269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Greenhouse WV, Lehninger AL. Occurrence of the malate-aspartate shuttle in various tumor types. Cancer Res. 1976;36(4):1392–1396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tai YS, Chen CH, Huang CY, Tai HC, Wang SM, Pu YS. Diabetes mellitus with poor glycemic control increases bladder cancer recurrence risk in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Diab/Metab Res Rev. 2015;31(3):307–314. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Whyard T, Waltzer WC, Waltzer D, Romanov V. Metabolic alterations in bladder cancer: applications for cancer imaging. Exp Cell Res. 2016;341(1):77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data (pooled HR with 95% CI of OS, CSS, PFS, RFS, and MFS) used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Articles from Cancer Cell International are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES