Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 3;11:43. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1545-x

Table 4.

Comparison of score changes at scheduled visits versus baseline between groups

Scale Timeframe (month after last dose) Control (n = 20), mean ± SEM hUC-MSC (n = 19), mean ± SEM P valueA
ADL 1 0.658 ± 1.117 2.868 ± 1.279 0.135
3 5.975 ± 1.782 12.447 ± 2.156 0.013*
6 10.125 ± 2.250 21.053 ± 2.860 0.003*
12 12.775 ± 2.465 22.974 ± 2.936 0.009*
CFA 1 1.474 ± 1.455 4.158 ± 1.804 0.324
3 7.425 ± 2.754 17.947 ± 3.317 0.021*
6 11.925 ± 3.253 23.790 ± 3.774 0.026*
12 15.175 ± 3.785 25.737 ± 3.947 0.061
GMFM 1 4.053 ± 3.001 − 1.316 ± 3.429 0.237
3 15.700 ± 6.746 32.053 ± 5.028 0.062
6 28.900 ± 8.807 59.000 ± 8.947 0.037*
12 36.800 ± 8.802 64.526 ± 9.600 0.045*

Abbreviations: ADL activities of daily living, CFA comprehensive function assessment, GMFM gross motor function measure, hUC-MSC human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell

AP value was calculated by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures

*P < 0.05