Table 5.

Association between lived experience and feasibility/desirability of elimination

	Desirable		Feasible
	PRR (95% CI)	APRR (95% CI)*	PRR (95% CI)	APRR (95% CI)*
Physical restraint
Professionals	1	1	1	1
Carers	1.33 (0.94–1.89)	1.32 (0.92–1.90)	1.28 (0.77–2.11)	1.24 (0.74–2.06)
Consumers	1.88 (1.39–2.54)	1.72 (1.25–2.36)	2.30 (1.51–3.49)	1.87 (1.20–2.91)
Mechanical restraint
Professionals	1	1	1	1
Carers	1.02 (0.89–1.17)	1.05 (0.91–1.20)	0.91 (0.77–1.07)	0.93 (0.78–1.10)
Consumers	1.12 (1.00–1.26)	1.12 (0.99–1.27)	1.08 (0.95–1.23)	1.05 (0.91–1.21)
Chemical restraint
Professionals	1	1	1	1
Carers	1.69 (1.16–2.46)	1.87 (1.25–2.79)	1.71 (1.04–2.83)	1.79 (1.06–3.02)
Consumers	2.23 (1.60–3.12)	2.25 (1.57–3.23)	2.71 (1.76–4.18)	2.13 (1.34–3.37)
Emotional restraint
Professionals	1	1	1	1
Carers	0.98 (0.90–1.06)	0.99 (0.92–1.08)	0.96 (0.86–1.07)	0.97 (0.87–1.09)
Consumers	1.01 (0.95–1.08)	1.03 (0.95–1.10)	1.00 (0.91–1.10)	1.03 (0.93–1.14)
Seclusion
Professionals	1	1	1	1
Carers	1.79 (1.36–2.35)	1.79 (1.35–2.36)	1.79 (1.29–2.49)	1.69 (1.21–2.34)
Consumers	2.10 (1.63–2.71)	1.89 (1.45–2.46)	2.31 (1.72–3.09)	2.00 (1.48–2.72)

PRR, prevalence risk ratio; APRR, adjusted prevalence risk ratio.

*Model adjusted for gender, age, Indigenous status, state of residency, urbanicity and education level.