Table 2.
Full model | Parsimonious model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coeff | SE | p | Coeff | SE | p | ||
Recruitment | Community | Ref. | |||||
Clinical | −0.15 | 0.09 | 0.11 | ||||
Other | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.65 | ||||
Target group | Adults | Ref. | |||||
Older adults | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.73 | ||||
Student population | 0.32 | 0.16 | 0.04 | ||||
Women with PPD | −0.14 | 0.12 | 0.27 | ||||
General medical | −0.04 | 0.11 | 0.73 | ||||
Other | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.65 | ||||
Diagnosis v. cut-off | −0.14 | 0.07 | 0.04 | ||||
Type | CBT | Ref. | |||||
Third wave | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.32 | ||||
BAT | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.55 | ||||
Psychodynamic | −0.14 | 0.18 | 0.42 | ||||
IPT | −0.10 | 0.13 | 0.42 | ||||
PST | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.45 | ||||
Supportive | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.99 | ||||
Other | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.91 | ||||
Format | Individual | Ref. | |||||
Group | −0.03 | 0.08 | 0.70 | ||||
Guided self-help | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.87 | ||||
Other/mixed | −0.19 | 0.14 | 0.19 | ||||
Number of sessions (continuous) | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.94 | ||||
Control group | Waiting list | Ref. | |||||
Care-as-usual | −0.12 | 0.09 | 0.17 | −0.22 | 0.07 | 0.002 | |
Other | −0.27 | 0.09 | 0.003 | −0.31 | 0.08 | <0.001 | |
Year (continuous) | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.16 | ||||
Western v. non-Western | 0.46 | 0.11 | <0.001 | 0.42 | 0.09 | <0.001 | |
Risk of bias (continuous) | −0.09 | 0.03 | 0.001 | −0.11 | 0.02 | <0.001 | |
Intercept | 12.76 | 8.17 | 0.12 | 1.08 | 0.07 | <0.001 | |
R2 analogue | 0.24 | 0.26 |
BAT, behavioural activation therapy; CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy; Coeff, regression coefficient; HAM-D, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; IPT, interpersonal psychotherapy; p, this p-value indicates whether the regression coefficient of the subgroups differ significantly from the reference group; PPD, postpartum depression; PST, problem-solving therapy; Ref, reference group; SE, standard error.