Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD004057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004057.pub3

Hurri 1989.

Methods RCT
Participants N=188; Mean age (yrs): 45.8; Gender (female): 100%; Diagnosis: patients with idiopathic LBP for at least 12 months. 
 Setting: Occupational
Interventions (E) Instruction material of back school in written form (no actual treatment was administered) (N=93); 
 (C) Modified Swedish back school: 6 x 60‐minutes education and exercise sessions in 3 weeks; 11 participants per group. Refresher course 2 x 60 min after 6 months (N=95);
Outcomes Pain (graph): 
 Pain VAS (0 to 100) at baseline, 6## and 12 mo (graph): (E) 86, 95, 89; (C) 91, 70, 78 
 Low Back Pain Index (0 to 20) at baseline, 6## and 12 mo (graph): (E) 18.2, 17.7, 17.5; (C) 17.8, 15.5, 16.2
Back pain‐specific functional status (graph): 
 Oswestry LBP Disability Questionnaire (0 to 100) at baseline, 6## and 12## mo: (E) 20.5, 21.5, 21.3; (C) 19.9, 19.2, 19.4
Return to work (no data) 
 Sick leave due to LBP: no significant differences
## (E) significantly less effective than (C) (p < 0.05).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? High risk  
Allocation concealment? High risk C ‐ Inadequate
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ patients? High risk  
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ providers? High risk  
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors? High risk  
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes ‐ drop‐outs during intervention? Low risk  
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes ‐ drop‐outs during follow‐up? Low risk  
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis? Low risk  
Similarity at baseline characteristics? Low risk  
Co‐interventions avoided or similar? High risk  
Compliance acceptable? High risk